Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32626398›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2019

Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 51st Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Statement on the maximum residue level for propamocarb in lettuces.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Two cases of diquat poisoning in adolescent children.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Targeted review of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for profenofos.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Targeted review of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for chlorfenapyr.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  14. Modification of the existing maximum residue level for propamocarb in honey.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Setting of import tolerances for sulfoxaflor in various crops.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  17. Setting of import tolerance for pyraclostrobin in papayas.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Setting of import tolerances for mandipropamid in papayas.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) 396/2005, EFSA received a request from the European Commission to provide support for the preparation of the EU position for 51st session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR). In 2018, JMPR evaluated 15 active substances regarding the setting of toxicological reference values to be used in consumer risk assessment (chlorfenapyr, ethiprole, fenpicoxamid, fluazinam, fluxapyroxad, imazalil, kresoxim-methyl, lambda-cyhalothrin, mandestrobin, mandipropamid, norflurazon, pydiflumetofen, pyraclostrobin, pyriofenone, tioxazafen) and 27 active substances regarding the setting of maximum residue limits (MRLs) (abamectin, bentazone, chlorfenapyr, cyantraniliprole, cyazofamid, diquat, ethiprole, fenpicoxamid, fenpyroximate, fluazinam, fludioxonil, fluxapyroxad, imazalil, isofetamid, kresoxim-methyl, lufenuron, mandipropamid, norflurazon, oxathiapiproline, profenofos, propamocarb, pydiflumetofen, pyraclostrobin, pyriofenone, pyriproxyfen, sulfoxaflor and tioxazafen); EFSA prepared comments on the Codex MRL proposals and the proposed toxicological reference values. In addition, EFSA provided comments on follow-up assessments of JMPR on pesticides where specific concerns were raised in the previous CCPR meetings. The current report should serve as the basis for deriving the EU position for the CCPR meeting.

Indexed as

CCPR meeting 2019consumer risk assessmentMRL settingresidue definitionstoxicological evaluation

Identifiers

PMID32626398
PMCPMC7009168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.