Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32626379›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2019

Pest categorisation of

EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), Claude Bragard, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Francesco Di Serio, Paolo Gonthier, Marie-Agnès Jacques, Josep Anton Jaques Miret, Annemarie Fejer Justesen, Christer Sven Magnusson, Panagiotis Milonas and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Multi-Omic Analysis Identifies Key Genes Driving Testicular Fusion inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A myeloid differentiation-like protein in partnership with Toll5 from the pest insectProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Male-killing virus in a noctuid mothProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
Claude Bragard
Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz
Francesco Di Serio
Paolo Gonthier
Marie-Agnès Jacques
Josep Anton Jaques Miret
Annemarie Fejer Justesen
Christer Sven Magnusson
Panagiotis Milonas
Juan A Navas-Cortes
Stephen Parnell
Roel Potting
Philippe Lucien Reignault
Hans-Hermann Thulke
Wopke Van der Werf
Antonio Vicent Civera
Jonathan Yuen
Lucia Zappalà
Chris Malumphy
Ewelina Czwienczek
Alan MacLeod

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLHP) performed a pest categorisation of

Indexed as

common cutwormpest riskplant healthplant pestquarantinetobacco cutworm

Identifiers

PMID32626379
PMCPMC7009099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.