Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32626364›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2019

Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547-127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2016-135).

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (EFSA GMO Panel), Hanspeter Naegeli, Jean-Louis Bresson, Tamas Dalmay, Ian Crawford Dewhurst, Michele Epstein, Leslie George Firbank, Philippe Guerche, Jan Hejatko, Francisco Javier Moreno and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (EFSA GMO Panel)
Hanspeter Naegeli
Jean-Louis Bresson
Tamas Dalmay
Ian Crawford Dewhurst
Michele Epstein
Leslie George Firbank
Philippe Guerche
Jan Hejatko
Francisco Javier Moreno
Ewen Mullins
Fabien Nogué
Nils Rostoks
Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano
Giovanni Savoini
Eve Veromann
Fabio Veronesi
Fernando Álvarez
Antonio Fernandez Dumont
Nikoletta Papadopoulou
Michele Ardizzone
Yann Devos
Andrea Gennaro
Jose Ángel Ruiz Gómez
Anna Lanzoni
Franco Maria Neri
Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos
Tommaso Raffaello
Giacomo De Sanctis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547-127 (three-event stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: MON 87708, MON 89788 and A5547-127. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events, leading to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single soybean events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three-event stack soybean does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the three-event stack soybean, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its conventional counterpart and the non-GM reference varieties tested. The nutritional impact of food/feed derived from the three-event stack soybean is expected to be the same as that of food/feed derived from the conventional counterpart and non-GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable seeds of the three-event stack soybean into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the three-event stack soybean. Post-market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the three-event stack soybean is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Indexed as

CP4 EPSPSDMOGMOimport and processingMON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127PATRegulation (EC) 1829/2003soybean (Glycine max)

Identifiers

PMID32626364
PMCPMC7009197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.