Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32626331›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2019

Guidance on the use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach in food safety assessment.

EFSA Scientific Committee, Simon J More, Vasileios Bampidis, Diane Benford, Claude Bragard, Thorhallur I Halldorsson, Antonio F Hernández-Jerez, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Kostas P Koutsoumanis, Kyriaki Machera and 14 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed
25.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 334 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Occurrence and Co-Occurrence of Regulated and Emerging Mycotoxins in Foods Marketed to U.S. Toddlers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  10. Safety of a feed additive consisting ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Safety Assessment ofToxics · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Toxicity and Appeal of Flavoured E-Cigarettes and Flavour Ban Outcomes: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

EFSA Scientific Committee
Simon J More
Vasileios Bampidis
Diane Benford
Claude Bragard
Thorhallur I Halldorsson
Antonio F Hernández-Jerez
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
Kostas P Koutsoumanis
Kyriaki Machera
Hanspeter Naegeli
Søren S Nielsen
Josef R Schlatter
Dieter Schrenk
Vittorio Silano
Dominique Turck
Maged Younes
Ursula Gundert-Remy
George E N Kass
Juliane Kleiner
Anna Maria Rossi
Rositsa Serafimova
Linda Reilly
Heather M Wallace
Lille Inflammation Research International Center · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Scientific Committee confirms that the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is a pragmatic screening and prioritisation tool for use in food safety assessment. This Guidance provides clear step-by-step instructions for use of the TTC approach. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are defined and the use of the TTC decision tree is explained. The approach can be used when the chemical structure of the substance is known, there are limited chemical-specific toxicity data and the exposure can be estimated. The TTC approach should not be used for substances for which EU food/feed legislation requires the submission of toxicity data or when sufficient data are available for a risk assessment or if the substance under consideration falls into one of the exclusion categories. For substances that have the potential to be DNA-reactive mutagens and/or carcinogens based on the weight of evidence, the relevant TTC value is 0.0025 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day. For organophosphates or carbamates, the relevant TTC value is 0.3 μg/kg bw per day. All other substances are grouped according to the Cramer classification. The TTC values for Cramer Classes I, II and III are 30 μg/kg bw per day, 9 μg/kg bw per day and 1.5 μg/kg bw per day, respectively. For substances with exposures below the TTC values, the probability that they would cause adverse health effects is low. If the estimated exposure to a substance is higher than the relevant TTC value, a non-TTC approach is required to reach a conclusion on potential adverse health effects.

Indexed as

Cramer classification schemerisk assessmentThreshold of toxicological concern

Identifiers

PMID32626331
PMCPMC7009090
OpenAlexW2948481670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.