ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2018
Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2014-122).
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 (application EFSA-GMO-ES-2017-147).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Assessment of genetically modified cotton T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 (application EFSA-GMO-BE-2018-155).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 for renewal authorisation under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF-2024-21890).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Assessment of genetically modified cotton T304-40 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF-2024-23010).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Comparative safety assessment of genetically modified crops: focus on equivalence with reference varieties could contribute to more efficient and effective field trials.Transgenic research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.