ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2018
Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 50th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Regulatory Mandates as Drivers for Advanced Chemical Analysis in Food Safety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Natamycin in Food and Ophthalmology: Knowledge Gaps and Emerging Insights from Zebrafish Models.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 56th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for spinetoram.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue level for chlormequat in oat.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels and setting of import tolerances for trifloxystrobin in various crops.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Setting of import tolerances for azoxystrobin in melons and watermelons.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue level for flonicamid in honey.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Review of the existing maximum residue levels for difenoconazole according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for flonicamid in various crops.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 54th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels or for flonicamid in kales, Chinese cabbages and kohlrabies.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue level for azoxystrobin in hops.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue level for trifloxystrobin in honey.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Statement on the risk assessment of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for oxamyl in view of consumer protection.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Modification of existing maximum residue levels in various crops and evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for trifloxystrobin.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Simultaneous Analysis of Fenpropimorph and Fenpropimorph Acid in Six Different Livestock Products Using a Single-Sample Preparation Method Followed by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Reasoned opinion on the joint review of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for fosetyl, disodium phosphonate and potassium phosphonates according to Articles 12 and 43 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- Review of the existing maximum residue levels for isopyrazam according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for cyprodinil in blueberries, cranberries, currants and gooseberries.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) 396/2005, EFSA received a request from the European Commission to provide support for the preparation of the EU position for 50th session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR). In 2017, Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) evaluated 15 active substances regarding the setting of toxicological reference values to be used in consumer risk assessment (bicyclopyrone, chlormequat, cyclaniliprole, fenazaquin, fenpropimorph, fenpyrazamine, fenpyroximate, fosetyl Al, isoprothiolane, natamycin, oxamyl, phosphonic acid, propylene oxide, thiophanate-methyl, triflumezopyrim) and 36 substances for deriving maximum residue limit (MRL) proposals (acetamiprid, azoxystrobin, bicyclopyrone, captan, chlormequat, cyclaniliprole, cyprodinil, 2,4-D, difenoconazole, fenazaquin, fenpropimorph, fenpyrazamine, fenpyroximate, flonicamid, fluensulfone, fluopyram, flupyradifurone, fosetyl Al, imazamox, imazapyr, imidacloprid, isoprothiolane, isopyrazam, natamycin, oxamyl, phosphonic acid, picoxystrobin, propiconazole, propylene oxide, prothioconazole, quinclorac, saflufenacil, spinetoram, tebuconazole, trifloxystrobin, triflumezopyrim); EFSA prepared comments on the Codex MRL proposals and the proposed toxicological reference values. In addition, EFSA provided the views on follow-up assessments of JMPR on pesticides where specific concerns were raised in the previous CCPR meetings. The current report should serve as the basis for deriving the EU position for the CCPR meeting, relevant findings are summarised in this report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.