ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2018
Refined exposure assessment of polyethylene glycol (E 1521) from its use as a food additive.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoscopic Characterization of the Thermal Phase Behavior of Random Poly(ethylene glycol-glycidyl methyl ether) Copolymers (rPEGs).Macromolecules · 2026Article
- Phase change material-based antibacterial nanoparticles for short-term preservation of cooked meat during temperature abuse.NPJ science of food · 2026Article
- Interaction of cytochrome P450 3A4 with the hydrophilic ligand tetraethylene glycol.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2026Article
- Safety evaluation of d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol-1000 succinate (Vitamin E TPGS) as a food additive.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Fabrication of 3D-Printed Scaffolds with Multiscale Porosity.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Offline Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for Deep Annotation of the Fecal Metabolome Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Quantitative Investigation on Exposure to Potentially Harmful Excipients by Injection Drug Administration in Children Under 2 Years of Age and Analysis of Association with Adverse Events: A Single-Center, Retrospective Observational Study.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Observational
- Anti-inflammatory potential of goldenberry-derived exosome-like nanoparticles in macrophage polarization.Future science OA · 2024Article
- Edible plant-derived exosomal microRNAs: Exploiting a cross-kingdom regulatory mechanism for targeting SARS-CoV-2.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2021Article
- Review: Vaccine Myth-Buster - Cleaning Up With Prejudices and Dangerous Misinformation.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- A cost-effective polyethylene glycol-based method for the isolation of functional edible nanoparticles from ginger rhizomes.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion on the refined exposure assessment of polyethylene glycol (E 1521) when used as a food additive. Polyethylene glycols were evaluated by several international bodies and the AFC Panel previously adopted scientific opinions on the safety polyethylene glycol (E 1521). In 2006, the Panel concluded that based on all the data, consumption of PEG through use as plasticisers in film-coating formulations for food supplement tablets and/or capsules at the intended use level are not of safety concern. In 2007, in another opinion of the AFC Panel related to d-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) in use for food for particular nutritional purposes, the Panel noted that TPGS intakes would correspond to intake to PEG 1000 at levels equivalent to 3.3-8.5 mg/kg body wieght (bw) per day which are within the range of group acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) of the SCF (1997) and JECFA (1980). This assessment could only take into account the use of polyethylene glycol (E 1521) in food supplements and thus the food supplements consumers only scenario was performed. It resulted in exposure estimates of polyethylene glycol (E 1521) up to 3.5 mg/kg bw per day at the mean and up to 6.1 mg/kg bw per day at the high level. The current exposure assessment is based on the methodology used in the re-evaluation of food additives together with reported use levels received following a call for data in 2017. Considering the uncertainties of the exposure assessment, these estimates very likely overestimated the real exposure to polyethylene glycol (E 1521). The Panel also noted that the highest calculated exposure estimate falls within the range of the group ADI previously established by SCF (5 mg/kg bw per day for PEG 300-4000) and of the one set by JECFA (10 mg/kg bw per day for PEG 200-10000).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.