Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32625927›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2018

Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children.

EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), Colin Ockleford, Paulien Adriaanse, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Philippe Berny, Theodorus Brock, Sabine Duquesne, Sandro Grilli, Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez, Michael Klein and 22 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The 2024 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. The 2023 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The 2022 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The 2021 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  9. The 2020 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The 2019 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)
Colin Ockleford
Paulien Adriaanse
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
Philippe Berny
Theodorus Brock
Sabine Duquesne
Sandro Grilli
Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez
Michael Klein
Thomas Kuhl
Ryszard Laskowski
Kyriaki Machera
Olavi Pelkonen
Silvia Pieper
Robert Smith
Michael Stemmer
Ingvar Sundh
Ivana Teodorovic
Aaldrik Tiktak
Christopher J Topping
Ursula Gundert-Remy
Mathilde Kersting
Ine Waalkens-Berendsen
Arianna Chiusolo
Danièle Court Marques
Bruno Dujardin
Georges E N Kass
Luc Mohimont
Alexandre Nougadère
Hermine Reich
Gerrit Wolterink

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) prepared a scientific opinion to provide a comprehensive evaluation of pesticide residues in foods for infants and young children. In its approach to develop this scientific opinion, the EFSA PPR Panel took into account, among the others, (i) the relevant opinions of the Scientific Committee for Food setting a default maximum residue level (MRL) of 0.01 mg/kg for pesticide residues in foods for infants and young children; (ii) the recommendations provided by EFSA Scientific Committee in a guidance on risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age; (iii) the knowledge on organ/system development in infants and young children. For infants below 16 weeks of age, the EFSA PPR Panel concluded that pesticide residues at the default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg for food for infants and young children are not likely to result in an unacceptable exposure for active substances for which a health-based guidance value (HBGV) of 0.0026 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or higher applies. Lower MRLs are recommended for active substances with HBGVs below this value. For infants above 16 weeks of age and young children, the established approach for setting HBGVs is considered appropriate. For infants below 16 weeks of age the approach may not be appropriate and the application of the EFSA guidance on risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age is recommended. The contribution of conventional food to the total exposure to pesticide residues is much higher than that from foods intended for infants and young children. Because of the increased intake of conventional food by young children, these have the highest exposure to pesticide residues, whereas infants 3-6 months of age generally have lower exposure. The impact of cumulative exposure to pesticide residues on infants and young children is not different from the general population and the EFSA cumulative risk assessment methodology is also applicable to these age groups. Residue definitions established under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are in general considered appropriate also for foods for infants and young children. However, based on a tier 1 analysis of the hydrolysis potential of pesticides simulating processing, the particular appropriateness of existing residue definitions for monitoring to cover processed food, both intended for infants and young children as well as conventional food, is questionable.

Indexed as

health‐based guidance valuesinfantsmaximum residue levelpesticide residuesyoung children

Identifiers

PMID32625927
PMCPMC7009577
OpenAlexW2810049291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.