ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2018
Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- The 2024 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Global Regulatory Mandates as Drivers for Advanced Chemical Analysis in Food Safety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The 2023 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Definition of maximum daily amounts of vitamins and minerals allowed in food supplements: scientific rationale and European regulatory frameworks.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Article
- The 2022 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Guidance document on the impact of water treatment processes on residues of active substances or their metabolites in water abstracted for the production of drinking water.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- The 2021 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- The 2020 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Household pesticide exposures and infant gross motor development in the MADRES cohort.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2022Article
- The 2019 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- Statement on the derivation of Health-Based Guidance Values (HBGVs) for regulated products that are also nutrients.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- Cumulative dietary risk assessment of chronic acetylcholinesterase inhibition by residues of pesticides.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- Cumulative dietary risk characterisation of pesticides that have chronic effects on the thyroid.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- Cumulative dietary risk characterisation of pesticides that have acute effects on the nervous system.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- Cumulative dietary exposure assessment of pesticides that have acute effects on the nervous system using SASEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- Cumulative dietary exposure assessment of pesticides that have chronic effects on the thyroid using SASEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 51st Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- Guidance on the use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach in food safety assessment.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- Scientific Opinion on the setting of health-based reference values for metabolites of the active substance terbuthylazine.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) prepared a scientific opinion to provide a comprehensive evaluation of pesticide residues in foods for infants and young children. In its approach to develop this scientific opinion, the EFSA PPR Panel took into account, among the others, (i) the relevant opinions of the Scientific Committee for Food setting a default maximum residue level (MRL) of 0.01 mg/kg for pesticide residues in foods for infants and young children; (ii) the recommendations provided by EFSA Scientific Committee in a guidance on risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age; (iii) the knowledge on organ/system development in infants and young children. For infants below 16 weeks of age, the EFSA PPR Panel concluded that pesticide residues at the default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg for food for infants and young children are not likely to result in an unacceptable exposure for active substances for which a health-based guidance value (HBGV) of 0.0026 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or higher applies. Lower MRLs are recommended for active substances with HBGVs below this value. For infants above 16 weeks of age and young children, the established approach for setting HBGVs is considered appropriate. For infants below 16 weeks of age the approach may not be appropriate and the application of the EFSA guidance on risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age is recommended. The contribution of conventional food to the total exposure to pesticide residues is much higher than that from foods intended for infants and young children. Because of the increased intake of conventional food by young children, these have the highest exposure to pesticide residues, whereas infants 3-6 months of age generally have lower exposure. The impact of cumulative exposure to pesticide residues on infants and young children is not different from the general population and the EFSA cumulative risk assessment methodology is also applicable to these age groups. Residue definitions established under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are in general considered appropriate also for foods for infants and young children. However, based on a tier 1 analysis of the hydrolysis potential of pesticides simulating processing, the particular appropriateness of existing residue definitions for monitoring to cover processed food, both intended for infants and young children as well as conventional food, is questionable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.