Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32625715›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2018

Guidance on the scientific requirements for health claims related to muscle function and physical performance: (Revision 1).

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (EFSA NDA Panel), Dominique Turck, Jacqueline Castenmiller, Stefaan De Henauw, Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst, John Kearney, Helle Katrine Knutsen, Alexandre Maciuk, Inge Mangelsdorf, Harry J McArdle and 24 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy and dose response ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Trial
  4. Nutrients · 2020
    Trial
  5. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Systematic review and meta-analysis: the effects of fermented milk withTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (EFSA NDA Panel)
Dominique Turck
Jacqueline Castenmiller
Stefaan De Henauw
Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst
John Kearney
Helle Katrine Knutsen
Alexandre Maciuk
Inge Mangelsdorf
Harry J McArdle
Androniki Naska
Carmen Pelaez
Kristina Pentieva
Frank Thies
Sophia Tsabouri
Marco Vinceti
Jean-Louis Bresson
Barbara Burlingame
Tara Dean
Susan Fairweather-Tait
Marina Heinonen
Monika Neuhäuser-Berthold
Grażyna Nowicka
Yolanda Sanz
Anders Sjödin
Martin Stern
Daniel Tomé
Henk Van Loveren
Peter Willatts
Ambroise Martin
John Joseph Strain
Leng Heng
Silvia Valtueña Martínez
Alfonso Siani
Lille Inflammation Research International Center · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EFSA has asked the Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) to update the guidance on the scientific requirements for health claims related to physical performance published in 2012. The update takes into account the experience gained by the NDA Panel with the evaluation of additional health claim applications, changes introduced to the general scientific guidance for stakeholders for health claims applications and information collected from a grant launched in 2014 which aimed at gathering information in relation to claimed effects, outcome variables and methods of measurement in the context of the scientific substantiation of health claims. The guidance is intended to assist applicants in preparing applications for the authorisation of health claims related to muscle function and physical performance. The draft guidance was subject to public consultation from 16 July to 2 September 2018. This document supersedes the guidance on the scientific requirements for health claims related to physical performance published in 2012. It is intended that the guidance will be further updated as appropriate in the light of experience gained from the evaluation of health claims.

Indexed as

guidancehealth claimsmuscle functionphysical performancescientific requirements

Identifiers

PMID32625715
PMCPMC7009729
OpenAlexW2899013637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.