Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32625679›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2018

Scientific opinion on chronic wasting disease (II).

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Antonia Ricci, Ana Allende, Declan Bolton, Marianne Chemaly, Robert Davies, Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez, Rosina Gironés, Lieve Herman, Kostas Koutsoumanis and 20 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Monitoring of chronic wasting disease (CWD) (IV).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Update on chronic wasting disease (CWD) III.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Scientific opinion on chronic wasting disease (II).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
Antonia Ricci
Ana Allende
Declan Bolton
Marianne Chemaly
Robert Davies
Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez
Rosina Gironés
Lieve Herman
Kostas Koutsoumanis
Roland Lindqvist
Birgit Nørrung
Lucy Robertson
Giuseppe Ru
Moez Sanaa
Panagiotis Skandamis
Emma Snary
Niko Speybroeck
Benno Ter Kuile
John Threlfall
Helene Wahlström
Sylvie Benestad
Dolores Gavier-Widen
Michael W Miller
Glenn C Telling
Morten Tryland
Francesca Latronico
Angel Ortiz-Pelaez
Pietro Stella
Marion Simmons

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on chronic wasting disease in two parts. Part one, on surveillance, animal health risk-based measures and public health risks, was published in January 2017. This opinion (part two) addresses the remaining Terms of Reference, namely, 'are the conclusions and recommendations in the EFSA opinion of June 2004 on diagnostic methods for chronic wasting disease still valid? If not, an update should be provided', and 'update the conclusions of the 2010 EFSA opinion on the results of the European Union survey on chronic wasting disease in cervids, as regards its occurrence in the cervid population in the European Union'. Data on the performance of authorised rapid tests in North America are not comprehensive, and are more limited than those available for the tests approved for statutory transmissible spongiform encephalopathies surveillance applications in cattle and sheep. There are no data directly comparing available rapid test performances in cervids. The experience in Norway shows that the Bio-Rad TeSeE™ SAP test, immunohistochemistry and western blotting have detected reindeer, moose and red deer cases. It was shown that testing both brainstem and lymphoid tissue from each animal increases the surveillance sensitivity. Shortcomings in the previous EU survey limited the reliability of inferences that could be made about the potential disease occurrence in Europe. Subsequently, testing activity in Europe was low, until the detection of the disease in Norway, triggering substantial testing efforts in that country. Available data neither support nor refute the conclusion that chronic wasting disease does not occur widely in the EU and do not preclude the possibility that the disease was present in Europe before the survey was conducted. It appears plausible that chronic wasting disease could have become established in Norway more than a decade ago.

Indexed as

cervidschronicdiagnosticoccurrencewasting

Identifiers

PMID32625679
PMCPMC7328883
OpenAlexW2789944119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.