Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32625629›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2017

Risk assessment of new sequencing information on genetically modified soybean event 40-3-2.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Nikoletta Papadopoulou, Matthew Ramon, Elisabeth Waigmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Nikoletta Papadopoulou
Matthew Ramon
Elisabeth Waigmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GMO Panel has previously assessed genetically modified (GM) soybean 40-3-2 as a single event and as part of a two-event stack, 305423 × 40-3-2. These soybean events were found to be as safe as their conventional counterparts and other appropriate comparators with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. On 4 April 2017, European Commission requested EFSA to analyse new nucleic acid sequencing and updated bioinformatics data for soybean event 40-3-2 and to indicate whether the conclusions of the GMO Panel on the previously assessed GM soybeans remain valid. The new sequencing data indicated that, the sequence of soybean event 40-3-2 as present in the stacked soybean 305423 × 40-3-2 contains an additional nucleotide in the 5' flanking region of a 72 bp additional insert of CP4 EPSPS present in soybean 40-3-2. Re-examination of the original sequencing data of the single soybean event 40-3-2 by the applicant, indicated that this additional nucleotide was already present in the original plant material used for the risk assessment of soybean event 40-3-2. Thus, with the exception of bioinformatics analyses, the studies performed for the risk assessment of the single event soybean 40-3-2 and the two-event stack soybean 305423 × 40-3-2 remain valid. The updated bioinformatic analyses performed on the corrected sequence did not give rise to safety issues. Therefore, EFSA concludes, based on the information provided, that the original risk assessment of the soybean event 40-3-2 as a single and the stacked soybean 305423 × 40-3-2 remains valid.

Indexed as

40‐3‐2GMOnucleotide sequenceRegulation (EC) No 1829/2003soybean (Glycine max)

Identifiers

PMID32625629
PMCPMC7010158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.