Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32625604›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2017

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): paratuberculosis.

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), Simon More, Anette Bøtner, Andrew Butterworth, Paolo Calistri, Klaus Depner, Sandra Edwards, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Margaret Good, Christian Gortázar Schmidt and 18 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Quantitative Risk Assessment of Exposure toFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Isothermal inactivation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Paratuberculosis in Captive Scimitar-Horned Oryxes (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pathogenesis, Molecular Genetics, and Genomics ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
Simon More
Anette Bøtner
Andrew Butterworth
Paolo Calistri
Klaus Depner
Sandra Edwards
Bruno Garin-Bastuji
Margaret Good
Christian Gortázar Schmidt
Virginie Michel
Miguel Angel Miranda
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Mohan Raj
Liisa Sihvonen
Hans Spoolder
Jan Arend Stegeman
Hans-Hermann Thulke
Antonio Velarde
Preben Willeberg
Christoph Winckler
Francesca Baldinelli
Alessandro Broglia
Gabriele Zancanaro
Beatriz Beltrán-Beck
Lisa Kohnle
Joana Morgado
Dominique Bicout
Animal Welfare Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paratuberculosis has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of paratuberculosis to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of paratuberculosis according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to paratuberculosis. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, paratuberculosis can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL. The disease would comply with the criteria in Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Annex IV of the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in points (c), (d) and (e) of Article 9(1). The animal species to be listed for paratuberculosis according to Article 8(3) criteria are several species of mammals and birds as susceptible species and some species of the families Bovidae, Cervidae and Leporidae as reservoirs.

Indexed as

Animal Health LawcategorisationimpactJohne's diseaselistingMAPMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisParatuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID32625604
PMCPMC7010113
OpenAlexW2741395302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.