ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2017
Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses).
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal slaughter and foetal wastage in Nigerian municipal abattoirs: Prevalence, drivers, economic losses and One Health implications.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Review
- Pregnant Pigs at Slaughter-An Overview of Legal and Ethical Frameworks, Reasons, Occurrence, and Fetal Age Determination.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Alternatives for fetal bovine serum (FBS) and sustainability of milk derivatives in cell culture.Biological research · 2026Review
- The use of Diathermic Syncope® for stunning cattle.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Sonographic Assessment of Fetometric Parameters in Pigs of Different Prolific Genotypes for Gestational Age Estimation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Welfare of horses at slaughter.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Article
- Welfare of sheep and goats during killing for purposes other than slaughter.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Indiscriminate slaughter of pregnant goats for meat in Enugu, Nigeria: Causes, prevalence, implications and ways-out.PloS one · 2023Article
- Welfare of cattle during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Welfare of pigs during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Welfare of equidae during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Welfare of small ruminants during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Welfare of sheep and goats at slaughter.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- Application of Methods to Assess Animal Welfare and Suffering Caused by Infectious Diseases in Cattle and Swine Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Electronic data collection to enhance disease surveillance at the slaughterhouse in a smallholder production system.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Slaughter Conditions and Slaughtering of Pregnant Cows in Southeast Nigeria: Implications to Meat Quality, Food Safety and Security.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Welfare of cattle at slaughter.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- Welfare of cattle during killing for purposes other than slaughter on-farm killing of cattle.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scientific opinion addresses animal welfare aspects of slaughtering of livestock pregnant animals. Term of Reference (ToR) 1 requested assessment of the prevalence of animals slaughtered in a critical developmental stage of gestation when the livestock fetuses might experience negative affect. Limited data on European prevalence and related uncertainties necessitated a structured expert knowledge elicitation (EKE) exercise. Estimated median percentages of animals slaughtered in the last third of gestation are 3%, 1.5%, 0.5%, 0.8% and 0.2% (dairy cows, beef cattle, pigs, sheep and goats, respectively). Pregnant animals may be sent for slaughter for health, welfare, management and economic reasons (ToR2); there are also reasons for farmers not knowing that animals sent for slaughter are pregnant. Measures to reduce the incidence are listed. ToR3 asked whether livestock fetuses can experience pain and other negative affect. The available literature was reviewed and, at a second multidisciplinary EKE meeting, judgements and uncertainty were elicited. It is concluded that livestock fetuses in the last third of gestation have the anatomical and neurophysiological structures required to experience negative affect (with 90-100% likelihood). However, there are two different possibilities whether they perceive negative affect. It is more probable that the neurophysiological situation does not allow for conscious perception (with 66-99% likelihood) because of brain inhibitory mechanisms. There is also a less probable situation that livestock fetuses can experience negative affect (with 1-33% likelihood) arising from differences in the interpretation of the fetal electroencephalogram, observed responses to external stimuli and the possibility of fetal learning. Regarding methods to stun and kill livestock fetuses at slaughter (ToR4), sets of scenarios and respective actions take account of both the probable and less probable situation regarding fetal ability for conscious perception. Finally, information was collated on methods to establish the dam's gestational stage based on physical features of livestock fetuses (ToR5).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.