Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32625488›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2017

Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses).

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), Simon More, Dominique Bicout, Anette Botner, Andrew Butterworth, Paolo Calistri, Klaus Depner, Sandra Edwards, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Margaret Good and 13 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The use of Diathermic Syncope® for stunning cattle.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Welfare of horses at slaughter.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Welfare of sheep and goats during killing for purposes other than slaughter.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Welfare of cattle during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  12. Welfare of pigs during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  13. Welfare of equidae during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  14. Welfare of small ruminants during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  15. Welfare of sheep and goats at slaughter.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Welfare of cattle at slaughter.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
Simon More
Dominique Bicout
Anette Botner
Andrew Butterworth
Paolo Calistri
Klaus Depner
Sandra Edwards
Bruno Garin-Bastuji
Margaret Good
Christian Gortazar Schmidt
Virginie Michel
Miguel Angel Miranda
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Antonio Velarde
Hans-Hermann Thulke
Liisa Sihvonen
Hans Spoolder
Jan Arend Stegeman
Mohan Raj
Preben Willeberg
Denise Candiani
Christoph Winckler
At Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scientific opinion addresses animal welfare aspects of slaughtering of livestock pregnant animals. Term of Reference (ToR) 1 requested assessment of the prevalence of animals slaughtered in a critical developmental stage of gestation when the livestock fetuses might experience negative affect. Limited data on European prevalence and related uncertainties necessitated a structured expert knowledge elicitation (EKE) exercise. Estimated median percentages of animals slaughtered in the last third of gestation are 3%, 1.5%, 0.5%, 0.8% and 0.2% (dairy cows, beef cattle, pigs, sheep and goats, respectively). Pregnant animals may be sent for slaughter for health, welfare, management and economic reasons (ToR2); there are also reasons for farmers not knowing that animals sent for slaughter are pregnant. Measures to reduce the incidence are listed. ToR3 asked whether livestock fetuses can experience pain and other negative affect. The available literature was reviewed and, at a second multidisciplinary EKE meeting, judgements and uncertainty were elicited. It is concluded that livestock fetuses in the last third of gestation have the anatomical and neurophysiological structures required to experience negative affect (with 90-100% likelihood). However, there are two different possibilities whether they perceive negative affect. It is more probable that the neurophysiological situation does not allow for conscious perception (with 66-99% likelihood) because of brain inhibitory mechanisms. There is also a less probable situation that livestock fetuses can experience negative affect (with 1-33% likelihood) arising from differences in the interpretation of the fetal electroencephalogram, observed responses to external stimuli and the possibility of fetal learning. Regarding methods to stun and kill livestock fetuses at slaughter (ToR4), sets of scenarios and respective actions take account of both the probable and less probable situation regarding fetal ability for conscious perception. Finally, information was collated on methods to establish the dam's gestational stage based on physical features of livestock fetuses (ToR5).

Indexed as

animal welfareconscious perceptionfetuslivestock speciespainpregnant animalsSlaughter

Identifiers

PMID32625488
PMCPMC7009911
OpenAlexW2619993836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.