Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32625432›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2017

Re-evaluation of soybean hemicellulose (E 426) as a food additive.

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS), Alicja Mortensen, Fernando Aguilar, Riccardo Crebelli, Alessandro Di Domenico, Birgit Dusemund, Maria Jose Frutos, Pierre Galtier, David Gott, Ursula Gundert-Remy and 15 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety evaluation of pectin-rich extract derived fromEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  2. Safety evaluation of pea fibre concentrate (FIPEA) as food additive.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Re-evaluation of soybean hemicellulose (E 426) as a food additive.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)
Alicja Mortensen
Fernando Aguilar
Riccardo Crebelli
Alessandro Di Domenico
Birgit Dusemund
Maria Jose Frutos
Pierre Galtier
David Gott
Ursula Gundert-Remy
Claude Lambré
Jean-Charles Leblanc
Oliver Lindtner
Peter Moldeus
Pasquale Mosesso
Agneta Oskarsson
Dominique Parent-Massin
Ivan Stankovic
Ine Waalkens-Berendsen
Matthew Wright
Maged Younes
Paul Tobback
Alexandra Tard
Stavroula Tasiopoulou
Rudolf Antonius Woutersen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of soybean hemicellulose (E 426) as a food additive. Soybean hemicellulose is not absorbed intact, but is extensively fermented by the intestinal microflora in animals and humans. No adverse effects were reported in a 90-day dietary toxicity study in rats at the highest doses tested of 2,430 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for males and 2,910 mg/kg bw per day for females. Furthermore, soybean hemicellulose is not of genotoxic concern. The highest exposure estimates calculated based on the maximum permitted levels were up to 191 mg/kg bw per day for children (95th percentile). Given the limited uses, if any, reported, the Panel considered it probable that the actual dietary exposure to soybean hemicellulose (E 426) would be negligible. Following the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives, the Panel concluded that it is very unlikely that there is a safety concern from the current use of soybean hemicellulose (E 426) as a food additive, and that there is no need for a numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI). The Panel recommended that the amount of residual proteins in E 426 should be reduced as much as possible, and that consumers should be informed of the presence of potentially allergenic proteins in the food additive.

Indexed as

E 426food additivesoybean hemicellulose

Identifiers

PMID32625432
PMCPMC7010024
OpenAlexW2596565994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.