Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32625422›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2017

Investigation into experimental toxicological properties of plant protection products having a potential link to Parkinson's disease and childhood leukaemia.

EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues (PPR), Colin Ockleford, Paulien Adriaanse, Philippe Berny, Theodorus Brock, Sabine Duquesne, Sandro Grilli, Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Michael Klein and 25 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Synergistic effects of HRSC advances · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Chlorpyrifos Occurrence and Toxicological Risk Assessment: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Virtual Cell Based Assay simulations of intra-mitochondrial concentrations in hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues (PPR)
Colin Ockleford
Paulien Adriaanse
Philippe Berny
Theodorus Brock
Sabine Duquesne
Sandro Grilli
Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
Michael Klein
Thomas Kuhl
Ryszard Laskowski
Kyriaki Machera
Olavi Pelkonen
Silvia Pieper
Rob Smith
Michael Stemmer
Ingvar Sundh
Ivana Teodorovic
Aaldrik Tiktak
Chris J Topping
Gerrit Wolterink
Karine Angeli
Ellen Fritsche
Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez
Marcel Leist
Alberto Mantovani
Pablo Menendez
Olavi Pelkonen
Anna Price
Barbara Viviani
Arianna Chiusolo
Federica Ruffo
Andrea Terron
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2013, EFSA published a literature review on epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and human health outcome. As a follow up, the EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues (PPR Panel) was requested to investigate the plausible involvement of pesticide exposure as a risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD) and childhood leukaemia (CHL). A systematic literature review on PD and CHL and mode of actions for pesticides was published by EFSA in 2016 and used as background documentation. The Panel used the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) conceptual framework to define the biological plausibility in relation to epidemiological studies by means of identification of specific symptoms of the diseases as AO. The AOP combines multiple information and provides knowledge of biological pathways, highlights species differences and similarities, identifies research needs and supports regulatory decisions. In this context, the AOP approach could help in organising the available experimental knowledge to assess biological plausibility by describing the link between a molecular initiating event (MIE) and the AO through a series of biologically plausible and essential key events (KEs). As the AOP is chemically agnostic, tool chemical compounds were selected to empirically support the response and temporal concordance of the key event relationships (KERs). Three qualitative and one putative AOP were developed by the Panel using the results obtained. The Panel supports the use of the AOP framework to scientifically and transparently explore the biological plausibility of the association between pesticide exposure and human health outcomes, identify data gaps, define a tailored testing strategy and suggests an AOP's informed Integrated Approach for Testing and Assessment (IATA).

Indexed as

AOPchildhood leukaemiaepidemiologyinfant leukaemiaParkinson's diseasepesticides

Identifiers

PMID32625422
PMCPMC7233269
OpenAlexW2597402764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.