ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2017
Re-evaluation of locust bean gum (E 410) as a food additive.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Interactions with Locust Bean Gum Regulate the Gelling Capacity of Myofibrillar Protein Emulsion: Effects of Locust Bean Gum Concentration.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of locust bean gum for cats, dogs, pigs and poultry (FEDIAF).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of Food Additives in Products with and Without Added Sugar on the Polish Market.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing the nutritional value and health risks of special low‑protein foods: narrative review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Review
- The prevalence and co-occurrence of emulsifiers, thickeners and stabilizers in food products on the Norwegian market.Food & nutrition research · 2025Article
- Nutritional, biochemical and health properties of Locust beans and its applications in the food industry: a review.Journal of food science and technology · 2024Review
- Food additive emulsifiers and cancer risk: Results from the French prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort.PLoS medicine · 2024Article
- An overview on the types, applications and health implications of fat replacers.Journal of food science and technology · 2024Review
- Choice Experiment Assessment of Consumer Preferences for Yogurt Products Attributes: Evidence from Taiwan.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of locust bean gum for all animal species (Dupont Nutrition and Health).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Scaffolds for Cultured Meat on the Basis of Polysaccharide Hydrogels Enriched with Plant-Based Proteins.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assemblage of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and green waste compost enhance drought stress tolerance in carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) trees.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Use of Chemometrics for Correlating Carobs Nutritional Compositional Values with Geographic Origin.Metabolites · 2020Article
- The Effect ofIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following a request from European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re-evaluating the safety of locust bean gum (E 410) as a food additive. Locust bean gum (E 410) is an authorised food additive in the EU. Locust bean gum (E 410) as specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 is derived from the ground endosperm of the seeds of the strains of carob tree,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.