ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020
New Analysis Framework Incorporating Mixed Mutual Information and Scalable Bayesian Networks for Multimodal High Dimensional Genomic and Epigenomic Cancer Data.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- DRUMBEAT temporally resolved interpretable machine learning model for characterizing state transitions in protein dynamics.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Temporally resolved and interpretable machine learning model of GPCR conformational transition.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Changes in expression of VGF, SPECC1L, HLA-DRA and RANBP3L act with APOE E4 to alter risk for late onset Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Bayesian network models identify cooperative GPCR:G protein interactions that contribute to G protein coupling.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2024Article
- The Human Brainome: changes in expression of VGF, SPECC1L, HLA-DRA and RANBP3L act with APOE E4 to alter risk for late onset Alzheimer's disease.Research square · 2023Article
- Bayesian network models identify co-operative GPCR:G protein interactions that contribute to G protein coupling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Integration of artificial intelligence in lung cancer: Rise of the machine.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Review
- Utilization of model-agnostic explainable artificial intelligence frameworks in oncology: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2022Review
- Concepts and Applications of Information Theory to Immuno-Oncology.Trends in cancer · 2021Review
- Dissecting Response to Cancer Immunotherapy by Applying Bayesian Network Analysis to Flow Cytometry Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a novel two-stage analysis strategy to discover candidate genes associated with the particular cancer outcomes in large multimodal genomic cancers databases, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). During the first stage, we use mixed mutual information to perform variable selection; during the second stage, we use scalable Bayesian network (BN) modeling to identify candidate genes and their interactions. Two crucial features of the proposed approach are (i) the ability to handle mixed data types (continuous and discrete, genomic, epigenomic, etc.) and (ii) a flexible boundary between the variable selection and network modeling stages - the boundary that can be adjusted in accordance with the investigators' BN software scalability and hardware implementation. These two aspects result in high generalizability of the proposed analytical framework. We apply the above strategy to three different TCGA datasets (LGG, Brain Lower Grade Glioma; HNSC, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma; STES, Stomach and Esophageal Carcinoma), linking multimodal molecular information (SNPs, mRNA expression, DNA methylation) to two clinical outcome variables (tumor status and patient survival). We identify 11 candidate genes, of which 6 have already been directly implicated in the cancer literature. One novel LGG prognostic factor suggested by our analysis, methylation of TMPRSS11F type II transmembrane serine protease, presents intriguing direction for the follow-up studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.