ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020
Antimicrobial Resistance in Swine Fecal Specimens Across Different Farm Management Systems.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Short Journey Transportation in the Spreading of Swine Pathogens and Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Effect of supplementing aBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2026Article
- Quantifying Dissemination of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Air from a Dairy Farm and Swine Farm.ACS ES&T air · 2025Article
- Genomic Insights of Antibiotic-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Global Food Transformation System: Edible Insects vs. Livestock.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- T-independent B-cell effect of agents associated with swine grower-finisher diarrhea.Veterinary research communications · 2024Article
- Prevalence, Diversity, and Virulence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Improvements of weaned pigs barn hygiene to reduce the spread of antimicrobial resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria from Meat and Meat Products: A One Health Perspective.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Within-Host Diversity of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Resistome from Healthy Pigs and Pig Farmers, with the Detection ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Silent Threat: Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens in Food-Producing Animals and Their Impact on Public Health.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Swine production: how sustainable is sustainability?Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2022Article
- Cross-Sectional Survey of Antibiotic Resistance in Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase-ProducingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Risk factors for the abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes aph(3')-III, erm(B), sul2 and tet(W) in pig and broiler faeces in nine European countries.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Use of Molecular Methods To DetectJournal of clinical microbiology · 2022Article
- Stabilization of swine faecal samples influences taxonomic and functional results in microbiome analyses.MethodsX · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from different pig production systems.Animal bioscience · 2022Article
- Genomic Insights ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial use in agricultural animals is known to be associated with increases in antimicrobial resistance. Most prior studies have utilized culture and susceptibility testing of select organisms to document these phenomena. In this study we aimed to detect 66 antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes for 10 antimicrobial agent classes directly in swine fecal samples using our previously developed antimicrobial resistance TaqMan array card (AMR-TAC) across three different swine farm management systems. This included 38 extensive antimicrobial use (both in treatment and feed), 30 limited antimicrobial use (treatment only), and 30 no antimicrobial use farms. The number of resistance genes detected in extensive antimicrobial use farms was higher than in limited and no antimicrobial use farms (28.2 genes ± 4.2 vs. 24.0 genes ± 4.1 and 22.8 genes ± 3.6, respectively,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.