ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2020
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applied at the Point of Care.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in medical imaging: a systematic review of techniques, applications, and challenges.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- The Reporting Quality of Machine Learning Studies on Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Challenges and Recommendations in Regulating AI Medical Devices in the European Union: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in mobile health applications: A comprehensive review of its role in diabetes care.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities: A Review of U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Approved Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning-Enabled Cardiovascular Devices.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Pharmacokinetics and Customized Dosing of Vancomycin in Adult Patients With Hematological Malignancies: Status, Challenges, and Opportunities.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Review
- AI-driven diagnosis of pneumococcal infections in children-a call for primary-care focused and a coherent evidence base.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- A hybrid ML-PBPK digital twin framework for clinically interpretable readmission risk and drug exposure stratification in diabetes.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Perceptions and Attitudes of Emergency Physicians in Saudi Arabia Regarding Medical Use of Artificial Intelligence.Cureus · 2025Article
- POC Sensor Systems and Artificial Intelligence-Where We Are Now and Where We Are Going?Biosensors · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Software as a Medical Device (AI-SaMD): A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Recommended approaches for integration of population pharmacokinetic modelling with precision dosing in clinical practice.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Review
- Clinical and Operational Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Pharmacy: A Narrative Review of Real-World Applications.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI-Induced Cybersecurity Risks in Healthcare: A Narrative Review of Blockchain-Based Solutions Within a Clinical Risk Management Framework.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Review
- Student Pharmacists' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacy Education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2024Article
- Activation of Immune Responses Through the RIG-I Pathway Using TRITC-Dextran Encapsulated Nanoparticles.Immune network · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence performance in testing microfluidics for point-of-care.Lab on a chip · 2024Article
- Review
- Role of Machine Learning Assisted Biosensors in Point-of-Care-Testing For Clinical Decisions.ACS sensors · 2024Review
- Medical-informed machine learning: integrating prior knowledge into medical decision systems.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe increasing availability of healthcare data and rapid development of big data analytic methods has opened new avenues for use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)- and Machine Learning (ML)-based technology in medical practice. However, applications at the point of care are still scarce.
objectiveReview and discuss case studies to understand current capabilities for applying AI/ML in the healthcare setting, and regulatory requirements in the US, Europe and China.
methodsA targeted narrative literature review of AI/ML based digital tools was performed. Scientific publications (identified in PubMed) and grey literature (identified on the websites of regulatory agencies) were reviewed and analyzed.
resultsFrom the regulatory perspective, AI/ML-based solutions can be considered medical devices (i.e., Software as Medical Device, SaMD). A case series of SaMD is presented. First, tools for monitoring and remote management of chronic diseases are presented. Second, imaging applications for diagnostic support are discussed. Finally, clinical decision support tools to facilitate the choice of treatment and precision dosing are reviewed. While tested and validated algorithms for precision dosing exist, their implementation at the point of care is limited, and their regulatory and commercialization pathway is not clear. Regulatory requirements depend on the level of risk associated with the use of the device in medical practice, and can be classified into administrative (manufacturing and quality control), software-related (design, specification, hazard analysis, architecture, traceability, software risk analysis, cybersecurity, etc.), clinical evidence (including patient perspectives in some cases), non-clinical evidence (dosing validation and biocompatibility/toxicology) and other, such as e.g. benefit-to-risk determination, risk assessment and mitigation. There generally is an alignment between the US and Europe. China additionally requires that the clinical evidence is applicable to the Chinese population and recommends that a third-party central laboratory evaluates the clinical trial results.
conclusionsThe number of promising AI/ML-based technologies is increasing, but few have been implemented widely at the point of care. The need for external validation, implementation logistics, and data exchange and privacy remain the main obstacles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.