Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32625008›Full record

ReviewEngineering in life sciences2019

Production of nanocellulose by enzymatic hydrolysis: Trends and challenges.

Ruan S A Ribeiro, Bruno C Pohlmann, Veronica Calado, Ninoska Bojorge, Nei Pereira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Engineering in life sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Engineering cellulases for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruan S A RibeiroDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Federal Fluminense University Niterói Rio de Janeiro Brazil.
Bruno C PohlmannDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Federal Fluminense University Niterói Rio de Janeiro Brazil.
Veronica CaladoSchool of Chemistry Center of Technology Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil.
Ninoska BojorgeDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Federal Fluminense University Niterói Rio de Janeiro Brazil.
Nei PereiraSchool of Chemistry Center of Technology Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a great interest in increasing the levels of production of nanocellulose, either by adjusting production systems or by improving the raw material. Despite all the advantages and applications, nanocellulose still has a high cost compared to common fibers and to reverse this scenario the development of new, cheaper, and more efficient means of production is required. The market trend is to have an increase in the mass production of nanocellulose; there is a great expectation of world trade. In this sense, research in this sector is on the rise, because once the cost is not an obstacle to production, this material will have more and more market. Production of the cellulose fibers is determinant for the production of nanocellulose by a hydrolyzing agent with a reasonable yield. This work presents several aspects of this new material, mainly addressing the enzymatic pathway, presenting the hydrolysis conditions such as pH, biomass concentration, enzymatic loading, temperature, and time. Also, the commonly used characterization methods are presented, as well as aspects of the nanocellulose production market.

Indexed as

characterization methodsendoglucanaseenzymatic hydrolysismarket trendnanocellulose

Identifiers

PMID32625008
PMCPMC6999516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.