Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32624994›Full record

ReviewEngineering in life sciences2019

Same but different-Scale up and numbering up in electrobiotechnology and photobiotechnology.

Franziska Enzmann, Markus Stöckl, An-Ping Zeng, Dirk Holtmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Engineering in life sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Exploitation of Biodiversity in Bioeconomy: Examples, Opportunities, and Challenges.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  3. Novel synthetic co-culture ofEngineering in life sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Empower C1: Combination of Electrochemistry and Biology to Convert C1 Compounds.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  5. Implementation of kMarine drugs · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Franziska EnzmannIndustrial Biotechnology DECHEMA Research Institute Frankfurt am Main Germany.
Markus StöcklElectrochemistry DECHEMA Research Institute Frankfurt am Main Germany.
An-Ping ZengInstitute of Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Technische Universität Hamburg Hamburg Germany.
Dirk HoltmannIndustrial Biotechnology DECHEMA Research Institute Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-3550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facing energy problems, there is a strong demand for new technologies dealing with the replacement of fossil fuels. The emerging fields of biotechnology, photobiotechnology and electrobiotechnology, offer solutions for the production of fuels, energy, or chemicals using renewable energy sources (light or electrical current e.g. produced by wind or solar power) or organic (waste) substrates. From an engineering point of view both technologies have analogies and some similar challenges, since both light and electron transfer are primarily surface-dependent. In contrast to that, bioproduction processes are typically volume dependent. To allow large scale and industrially relevant applications of photobiotechnology and electrobiotechnology, this opinion first gives an overview over the current scales reached in these areas. We then try to point out the challenges and possible methods for the scale up or numbering up of the reactors used. It is shown that the field of photobiotechnology is by now much more advanced than electrobiotechnology and has achieved industrial applications in some cases. We argue that transferring knowledge from photobiotechnology to electrobiotechnology can speed up the development of the emerging field of electrobiotechnology. We believe that a combination of scale up and numbering up, as it has been shown for several photobiotechnological reactors, may well lead to industrially relevant scales in electrobiotechnological processes allowing an industrial application of the technology in near future.

Indexed as

electrobiotechnologynumbering upphotobiotechnologyreactor designscale up

Identifiers

PMID32624994
PMCPMC6999560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.