ReviewEngineering in life sciences2018
Experimental characterization and simulation of amino acid and peptide interactions with inorganic materials.
Review in Engineering in life sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Bare Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Carrier for the Short Cationic Peptide Lasioglossin.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Bio-nano interactions: binding proteins, polysaccharides, lipids and nucleic acids onto magnetic nanoparticles.Biomaterials research · 2021Review
- Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2020Article
- Magnetic One-Step Purification of His-Tagged Protein by Bare Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.ACS omega · 2019Article
- Bare Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Magnetic Harvesting of Microalgae: From Interaction Behavior to Process Realization.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inspired by nature, many applications and new materials benefit from the interplay of inorganic materials and biomolecules. A fundamental understanding of complex organic-inorganic interactions would improve the controlled production of nanomaterials and biosensors to the development of biocompatible implants for the human body. Although widely exploited in applications, the interaction of amino acids and peptides with most inorganic surfaces is not fully understood. To date, precisely characterizing complex surfaces of inorganic materials and analyzing surface-biomolecule interactions remain challenging both experimentally and computationally. This article reviews several approaches to characterizing biomolecule-surface interactions and illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of the methods presented. First, we explain how the adsorption mechanism of amino acids/peptides to inorganic surfaces can be determined and how thermodynamic and kinetic process constants can be obtained. Second, we demonstrate how this data can be used to develop models for peptide-surface interactions. The understanding and simulation of such interactions constitute a basis for developing molecules with high affinity binding domains in proteins for bioprocess engineering and future biomedical technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.