Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32624858›Full record

ArticleEngineering in life sciences2018

Optimization of cell culture-derived influenza A virus particles purification using sulfated cellulose membrane adsorbers.

Ana Raquel Fortuna, Florian Taft, Louis Villain, Michael W Wolff, Udo Reichl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Engineering in life sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Editorial: Advances in bioprocessing of viral vectors and virus-like particles.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  3. Chromatographic Purification of Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Purification of influenza virus-like particles using sulfated cellulose membrane adsorbers.Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire : 1986) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Raquel FortunaBioprocess Engineering Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems Magdeburg Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-0423
Florian TaftR&D Membrane Modification Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH Göttingen Germany.
Louis VillainR&D Membrane Modification Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH Göttingen Germany.
Michael W WolffBioprocess Engineering Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems Magdeburg Germany.
Udo ReichlBioprocess Engineering Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems Magdeburg Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Downstream processing remains one of the biggest challenges in manufacturing of biologicals and vaccines. This work focuses on a Design of Experiments approach to understand factors influencing the performance of sulfated cellulose membrane adsorbers for the chromatographic purification of a cell culture-derived H1N1 influenza virus strain (A/Puerto Rico/8/34). Membranes with a medium ligand density together with low conductivity and a high virus titer in the feed stream resulted in optimum virus yields and low protein and DNA content in the product fraction. Flow rate and salt concentration in the buffer used for elution were of secondary importance while membrane permeability had no significant impact on separation performance. A virus loss of 2.1% in the flow through, a yield of 57.4% together with a contamination level of 5.1 pg

Indexed as

Design of ExperimentsDownstream processingInfluenza A virus purificationMembrane adsorption chromatographySulfated cellulose

Identifiers

PMID32624858
PMCPMC6999594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.