ArticleEngineering in life sciences2017
Pool-less processing to streamline downstream purification of monoclonal antibodies.
Article in Engineering in life sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of a perfusion reactor and continuous precipitation in an entirely membrane-based process for antibody capture.Engineering in life sciences · 2023Article
- Filter made of cuprammonium regenerated cellulose for virus removal: a mini-review.Cellulose (London, England) · 2022Review
- A novel twin-column continuous chromatography approach for separation and enrichment of monoclonal antibody charge variants.Engineering in life sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Polishing approach with fully connected flow-through purification for therapeutic monoclonal antibody.Engineering in life sciences · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With cell culture titers and productivity increasing in the last few years, pressure has been placed on downstream purification to look at alternative strategies to meet the demand of biotech products with high dose requirements. Even when the upstream process is not continuous (perfusion based), adopting a more productive and/or continuous downstream process can be of significant advantage. Due to the recent trend in exploring continuous processing options for biomolecules, several enabling technologies have been assessed at Biogen. In this paper, we evaluate the capability of one of these technologies to streamline and improve our downstream mAb purification platform. Current conventional downstream polishing steps at Biogen are operated in flow-through mode to achieve higher loadings while maintaining good selectivity. As titers increase, this would result in larger columns and larger intermediate product pool holding tanks. A semicontinuous downstream process linking the second and third chromatography steps in tandem can reduce/eliminate intermediate holding tanks, reduce overall processing time, and combine unit operations to reduce validation burdens. A pool-less processing technology utilizing inline adjustment functionality was evaluated to address facility fit challenges for three high titer mAbs. Two different configurations of polishing steps were examined: (i) anion exchange and hydrophobic interaction and (ii) anion exchange and mixed mode chromatography. Initial laboratory scale proof of concept studies showed comparable performance between the batch purification process and the pool-less process configuration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.