Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32624748›Full record

ArticleEngineering in life sciences2017

Rapid process synthesis supported by a unified modular software framework.

Sebastian Herold, Dominik Krämer, Norman Violet, Rudibert King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Engineering in life sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sebastian HeroldChair of Measurement and Control Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Germany.
Dominik KrämerChair of Measurement and Control Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Germany.
Norman VioletDepartment Experimental Toxicology and ZEBET Federal Institute for Risk Assessment Berlin Germany.
Rudibert KingChair of Measurement and Control Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although known to be very powerful, the widespread application of model-based techniques is still significantly hampered in the area of bio-processes. Reasons for this situation can be found along the whole chain to set up and implement such approaches. In a time-consuming step, models are typically hand-crafted. Whether alternatives of better models exist to actually fulfill the final goals is undocumented, most often even unknown. In a next step, model-based process control methods are hand-coded in an error-prone procedure. For many of these methods given in the literature, only simulation studies are shown, leaving the interested reader with the unanswered question whether the implementation of a specific method in a real process is viable. As the potentially time-consuming implementation of such a method presents a risk for a rapid process development, promising candidates may be overlooked. To remediate this unsatisfactory situation, a combination of theoretical methods and information technology is proposed here. By an exemplarily realized software tool, it is shown how such an environment helps to promote model-based optimization, supervision, and control of bio-processes and allows for an inexpensive test of new ideas as well in real-life experiments. The contribution concentrates on an overview of a possible software architecture with respect to necessary methods and a meaningful information strategy, highlighting some of the more crucial building blocks. Experimental results exploiting parts of the proposed methods are given for a yeast strain synthesizing a product of industrial interest.

Indexed as

ModelingModeling softwareProcess designState estimationTrajectory planning

Identifiers

PMID32624748
PMCPMC6999271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.