ReviewInternational journal of medical sciences2020
The Process of Osteoblastic Infection by
Review in International journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- N6 methyl adenosine-stabilized microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 ameliorates staphylococcal protein A-induced damage in osteocyte-like MLO-Y4 cells.Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 2026Article
- Comparing Clinical, Microbiological, and Genetic Definitions of Relapse in Patients With Subsequent Episodes of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bone and Joint Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Regulated Cell Death Pathways in Chondrocytes During Septic Arthritis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Intracellular survival ofVirulence · 2025Review
- Decellularized bone extracellular matrix embedded with PLGA-linezolid microparticles for infected bone regeneration.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Mucosomes as next-generation drug carriers for treating mucus-resident bacterial infections and biofilms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Addressing the challenges of infectious bone defects: a review of recent advances in bifunctional biomaterials.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Dual function ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparative study of the inhibitory effects of different antibiotic administration routes on bone healing in a rat tibial infection model.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- From macrophage polarization to clinical translation: immunomodulatory hydrogels for infection-associated bone regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Prospects and challenges for the application of tissue engineering technologies in the treatment of bone infections.Bone research · 2024Review
- A review on antimicrobial strategies in mitigating biofilm-associated infections on medical implants.Current research in microbial sciences · 2024Review
- Osteomyelitis is associated with increased anti-inflammatory response and immune exhaustion.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Promising applications of D-amino acids in periprosthetic joint infection.Bone research · 2023Review
- The Incidence, Changes and Treatments of Cervical Deformity After Infection and Inflammation.Neurospine · 2023Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of chronic osteomyelitis based on nanomaterials.World journal of orthopedics · 2023Review
- Antimicrobial Biomaterials for the Healing of Infected Bone Tissue: A Systematic Review of Microtomographic Data on Experimental Animal Models.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Nanotechnology in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteomyelitis.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Structural Analysis of Mitochondrial Dynamics-From Cardiomyocytes to Osteoblasts: A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone infection is difficult to cure, and relapse frequently occurs, which is a major treatment problem. One of the main reasons for the refractory and recurrent nature of bone infection is that bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), can be internalized into osteoblasts after infecting bone tissue, thereby avoiding attack by the immune system and antibiotics. Understanding how bacteria (such as S. aureus) are internalized into osteoblasts is key to effective treatment. S. aureus is the most common pathogenic bacterium that causes bone infection. This paper reviews the literature, analyzes the specific process of osteoblastic S. aureus infection, and summarizes specific treatment strategies to improve bone infection treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.