ArticleActa histochemica et cytochemica2020
Immunohistochemical Pharmacokinetics of the Anti-diabetes Drug Alogliptin in Rat Kidney and Liver.
Article in Acta histochemica et cytochemica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of immunohistochemistry for detecting fluvoxamine in rat tissues using newly prepared monoclonal antibody: its precise localization in small intestine, kidney, and liver of rats.Medical molecular morphology · 2023Article
- Immunohistochemical Localization of Alogliptin, a DPP-4 Inhibitor, in Tissues of Normal and Type 2 Diabetes Model Rat.Acta histochemica et cytochemica · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alogliptin is one of a new class of therapeutic agents for type 2 diabetes called dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Here, we used immunohistochemistry to investigate the pharmacokinetics of alogliptin at the cell and tissue levels in the rat kidney and liver. One hour after alogliptin administration, the most noticeable immunoreactivity in the kidney was a moderate-to-strong staining in proximal tubule S3 segment epithelial cells. On the other hand, immunostaining was found only in the microvilli of S1 and S2 segment cells. Immunoreactivity was also observed in the glomerulus and distal tubules. Positive cells and almost negative cells coexisted in the collecting ducts. Twenty-four hours after administration, moderate immunostaining remained in the S3 segment but staining in other regions had almost disappeared. In the liver 1 hr after administration, hepatocyte staining differed in the hepatic lobule, with zone III being stronger than zone I. Immunostaining had almost disappeared 24 hr after administration. These findings suggest that alogliptin reabsorption at the kidney and uptake at the hepatocyte vary from region to region and that one or more types of transporter are involved in these processes. In addition, long-term alogliptin use may cause the drug to accumulate in S3 segment, leading to adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.