Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32624476›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Artificial intelligence method to classify ophthalmic emergency severity based on symptoms: a validation study.

Hyunmin Ahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hyunmin AhnOphthalmology, Armed Forces Daegu Hospital, Daegu, Korea (the Republic of) overhyun31@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1529-5123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe investigated the usefulness of machine learning artificial intelligence (AI) in classifying the severity of ophthalmic emergency for timely hospital visits. STUDY

designThis retrospective study analysed the patients who first visited the Armed Forces Daegu Hospital between May and December 2019. General patient information, events and symptoms were input variables. Events, symptoms, diagnoses and treatments were output variables. The output variables were classified into four classes (red, orange, yellow and green, indicating immediate to no emergency cases). About 200 cases of the class-balanced validation data set were randomly selected before all training procedures. An ensemble AI model using combinations of fully connected neural networks with the synthetic minority oversampling technique algorithm was adopted.

participantsA total of 1681 patients were included. MAJOR OUTCOMES: Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall and F1 scores.

resultsThe accuracy of the model was 99.05%. The precision of each class (red, orange, yellow and green) was 100%, 98.10%, 92.73% and 100%. The recalls of each class were 100%, 100%, 98.08% and 95.33%. The F1 scores of each class were 100%, 99.04%, 95.33% and 96.00%.

conclusionsWe provided support for an AI method to classify ophthalmic emergency severity based on symptoms.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsEmergency Service, HospitalHumansRetrospective Studiesaccident & emergency medicinebiotechnology & bioinformaticsophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID32624476
PMCPMC7337880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.