Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32624390›Full record

ArticleEuropean annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases2020

Telemedicine for ENT: Effect on quality of care during Covid-19 pandemic.

M Fieux, S Duret, N Bawazeer, L Denoix, S Zaouche, S Tringali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Patient Satisfaction with Virtual vs In-Person Voice Therapy.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19: Impact on the Musician and Returning to Singing; A Literature Review.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical signs, telemedicine and online consultations in head and neck diseases during the SARS CoV-2 pandemic: an Italian experience.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M FieuxService d'Otologie et d'Otoneurologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69495, Pierre-Bénite, France. Electronic address: maxime.fieux@chu-lyon.fr.
S DuretService d'Otologie et d'Otoneurologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69495, Pierre-Bénite, France.
N BawazeerService d'Otorhinolaryngologie et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Umm Al Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
L DenoixService d'Otologie et d'Otoneurologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69495, Pierre-Bénite, France.
S ZaoucheService d'Otologie et d'Otoneurologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69495, Pierre-Bénite, France.
S TringaliService d'Otologie et d'Otoneurologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69495, Pierre-Bénite, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess the benefit of telemedicine consultation during the Covid-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND

methodsA prospective study of patient satisfaction with telemedicine consultation was carried out in the ENT department of a university hospital center where telemedicine consultations were set up to replace scheduled out-patient consultations. Patients were divided into two groups according to overall satisfaction, in order to identify predictive factors. The significance threshold was set at P<0.005. The main endpoint was patient satisfaction after an ENT telemedicine consultation during global lockdown. The secondary endpoint comprised predictive factors for overall satisfaction.

resultsOne hundred of the 125 patients with telemedicine consultation over a 7-day inclusion period completed the questionnaire. Overall satisfaction was 87%. There were no clinically relevant predictive factors significantly associated with satisfaction. Sound and video quality was satisfactory for 76% and 61% of patients respectively, without significant impact on overall satisfaction (respectively: OR=3.40, P-value=0.049; and OR=3.79, P-value=0.049). Lack of physical examination did not significantly correlate with reduced overall satisfaction (OR=0.30, P-value=0.027).

conclusionTelemedicine consultation did not allow complete medical care but, in a difficult time like the global pandemic, was well accepted by patients. It is a simple way to maintain continuity of care while reducing contamination risk by avoiding direct contact between patients and healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPatient SatisfactionPneumonia, ViralQuality of Health CareTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesProspective StudiesCovid-19OtolaryngologySatisfactionTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32624390
PMCPMC7306717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.