ArticleCell transplantation
Umbilical Cord Blood Units Cryopreserved in the Public Cord Blood Bank: A Breakthrough in iPSC Haplobanking?
Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hematopoietic stem cells and HSCs-derived from pluripotent stem cells: a hopeful outlook in cell-based therapeutics.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Constructing a potential HLA haplo-homozygous induced pluripotent stem cell haplobank using data from an umbilical cord blood bank.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Immunophenotypic and Functional Interindividual Variability in Banked Cord Blood Cells: Insights for Advanced Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Perspectives for the Use of Umbilical Cord Blood in Transplantation and Beyond: Initiatives for an Advanced and Sustainable Public Banking Program in Greece.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Ethical challenges of cord blood banks: a scoping review.Journal of medicine and life · 2022Article
- High Integrity and Fidelity of Long-Term Cryopreserved Umbilical Cord Blood for Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is an emerging therapeutic option for precision medicine. Cord blood (CB) cells with lower immunogenicity, fewer genomic changes, and persistent epigenetic memory might be ideal candidates for iPSC production. Based on the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) distribution of cord blood units (CBUs) in the public CB bank, we estimated the coverage of the Korean population with HLA-homozygous iPSCs to repurpose cryopreserved CBUs. We analyzed a total of 27,904 Korean CBUs donated to the public CB bank. Low-to-intermediate resolution typing was performed for HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 alleles, and individuals possessing homozygous HLA haplotypes were identified by direct counting. Moreover, the matching probabilities for zero-mismatch transplantation were calculated for 27,904 CBUs and 50,000,000 potential Korean patients. Among the preserved CBUs, 15 HLA-A, 40 HLA-B, and 13 HLA-DRB1 alleles as well as 48 homozygous HLA-A-B-DRB1 haplotypes were identified at serological equivalents (2 digits). The 48 identified homozygous haplotypes cumulatively matched 78.18% of the 27,904 Korean CB donors as zero HLA-mismatch iPSC sources. Among the combinations of 1,699 haplotypes with frequencies greater than 0.001%, assuming a population of 50 million, those 48 haplotypes can provide a match for 78.37% of potential Korean recipients. A practicable number of HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 homozygous iPSC lines derived from CBUs may be an efficient option in allogeneic iPSC therapy because this type of haplobanking may provide cell lines with optimal HLA matching for up to three-quarters of the Korean population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.