ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020
Ischemia and outcome prediction by cardiac CT based machine learning.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of artificial intelligence in early detection and risk prediction of ischemic heart disease.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- AI-Driven multi-view learning from CCTA for myocardial infarction diagnosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Review
- Gender Differences in Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Plaque Composition by Coronary CT Angiography: Association with Cardiovascular Outcome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary CT Angiography: Current Status and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence in echocardiography: detection, functional evaluation, and disease diagnosis.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2021Review
- Introduction topical issue on CT plaque burden.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac CT using non-enhanced coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and coronary CT angiography (cCTA) has been proven to provide excellent evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) combining anatomical and morphological assessment of CAD for cardiovascular risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making, in addition to providing prognostic value for the occurrence of adverse cardiac outcome. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) and, in particular, the application of machine learning (ML) algorithms, have been promoted in cardiovascular CT imaging for improved decision pathways, risk stratification, and outcome prediction in a more objective, reproducible, and rational manner. AI is based on computer science and mathematics that are based on big data, high performance computational infrastructure, and applied algorithms. The application of ML in daily routine clinical practice may hold potential to improve imaging workflow and to promote better outcome prediction and more effective decision-making in patient management. Moreover, CT represents a field wherein ML may be particularly useful, such as CACS and cCTA. Thus, the purpose of this review is to give a short overview about the contemporary state of ML based algorithms in cardiac CT, as well as to provide clinicians with currently available scientific data on clinical validation and implementation of these algorithms for the prediction of ischemia-specific CAD and cardiovascular outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.