Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32623625›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020

Ischemia and outcome prediction by cardiac CT based machine learning.

Verena Brandt, Tilman Emrich, U Joseph Schoepf, Danielle M Dargis, Richard R Bayer, Carlo N De Cecco, Christian Tesche

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. AI-Driven multi-view learning from CCTA for myocardial infarction diagnosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Introduction topical issue on CT plaque burden.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Verena BrandtDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA.
Tilman EmrichDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA.
U Joseph SchoepfDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA. schoepf@musc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6164-5641
Danielle M DargisDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA.
Richard R BayerDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA.
Carlo N De CeccoDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Emory Healthcare, Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA.
Christian TescheDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USEmory Healthcare · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac CT using non-enhanced coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and coronary CT angiography (cCTA) has been proven to provide excellent evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) combining anatomical and morphological assessment of CAD for cardiovascular risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making, in addition to providing prognostic value for the occurrence of adverse cardiac outcome. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) and, in particular, the application of machine learning (ML) algorithms, have been promoted in cardiovascular CT imaging for improved decision pathways, risk stratification, and outcome prediction in a more objective, reproducible, and rational manner. AI is based on computer science and mathematics that are based on big data, high performance computational infrastructure, and applied algorithms. The application of ML in daily routine clinical practice may hold potential to improve imaging workflow and to promote better outcome prediction and more effective decision-making in patient management. Moreover, CT represents a field wherein ML may be particularly useful, such as CACS and cCTA. Thus, the purpose of this review is to give a short overview about the contemporary state of ML based algorithms in cardiac CT, as well as to provide clinicians with currently available scientific data on clinical validation and implementation of these algorithms for the prediction of ischemia-specific CAD and cardiovascular outcome.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyMachine LearningRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansPlaque, AtheroscleroticPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexVascular CalcificationCoronary artery diseaseCoronary CT angiographyMachine learningOutcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID32623625
OpenAlexW3039275933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.