Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32623613›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Combining visual analytics and case-based reasoning for rupture risk assessment of intracranial aneurysms.

Lena Spitz, Uli Niemann, Oliver Beuing, Belal Neyazi, I Erol Sandalcioglu, Bernhard Preim, Sylvia Saalfeld

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lena SpitzFaculty of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106, Magdeburg, Germany.
Uli NiemannFaculty of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106, Magdeburg, Germany.
Oliver BeuingUniversity Hospital Magdeburg, Germany, Leipziger Str. 44, D-39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Belal NeyaziUniversity Hospital Magdeburg, Germany, Leipziger Str. 44, D-39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
I Erol SandalciogluUniversity Hospital Magdeburg, Germany, Leipziger Str. 44, D-39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Bernhard PreimFaculty of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106, Magdeburg, Germany.
Sylvia SaalfeldFaculty of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106, Magdeburg, Germany. sylvia.saalfeld@ovgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9059-015X
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEExperimental Factory Magdeburg · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13GW0095AGerman Research Foundation SA 3461/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedical case-based reasoning solves problems by applying experience gained from the outcome of previous treatments of the same kind. Particularly for complex treatment decisions, for example, incidentally found intracranial aneurysms (IAs), it can support the medical expert. IAs bear the risk of rupture and may lead to subarachnoidal hemorrhages. Treatment needs to be considered carefully, since it may entail unnecessary complications for IAs with low rupture risk. With a rupture risk prediction based on previous cases, the treatment decision can be supported.

methodsWe present an interactive visual exploration tool for the case-based reasoning of IAs. In presence of a new aneurysm of interest, our application provides visual analytics techniques to identify the most similar cases with respect to morphology. The clinical expert can obtain the treatment, including the treatment outcome, for these cases and transfer it to the aneurysm of interest. Our application comprises a heatmap visualization, an adapted scatterplot matrix and fully or partially directed graphs with a circle- or force-directed layout to guide the interactive selection process. To fit the demands of clinical applications, we further integrated an interactive identification of outlier cases as well as an interactive attribute selection for the similarity calculation. A questionnaire evaluation with six trained physicians was used.

resultOur application allows for case-based reasoning of IAs based on a reference data set. Three classifiers summarize the rupture state of the most similar cases. Medical experts positively evaluated the application.

conclusionOur case-based reasoning application combined with visual analytic techniques allows for representation of similar IAs to support the clinician. The graphical representation was rated very useful and provides visual information of the similarity of the k most similar cases.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsAlgorithmsComputer GraphicsDatabases, FactualDecision MakingDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansIntracranial AneurysmModels, StatisticalRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesUser-Computer InterfaceCase-based reasoningIntracranial aneurysmsRupture risk assessmentVisual analytics

Identifiers

PMID32623613
PMCPMC7420879
OpenAlexW3038267234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.