ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2020
Role of (Neo)adjuvant Denosumab for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-target neoadjuvant therapy with denosumab and sunitinib for giant cell tumor of bone: a sarcoma center experience.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Article
- Functional Outcome of Curettage and Chemical Cauterization with Bone Grafting and Fixation with Neo-Adjuvant Denosumab Therapy in a Case of Giant Cell Tumor of Navicular Bone of a Young Adult - A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Denosumab Regulates Titanium Particles-Induced Macrophages Inflammation and Osteolysis by Targeting the ST18/PARP1 Interaction.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- A Multicenter Study by the DENO Research Group on the Use of Denosumab in Giant-Cell Tumors of the Bone.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Establishment and characterization of NCC-GCTB10-C1: a novel cell line derived from a patient with recurrent giant cell tumor of bone.Human cell · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of denosumab de‑escalation in giant cell tumor of bone.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Surgical Strategy for Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor in the Thoracolumbar Spine.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Repercussions of Denosumab in Patients With Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Observational Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- Management of a rare mandibular giant cell tumor of bone by neoadjuvant denosumab therapy and surgery: A 4-year follow-up case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
- Preliminary Results of Preoperative Planning Using 3D Printing and Augmented Reality in Cryotherapy Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone-CRIO2AR Project.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Proximal Tibia Tumour Location and Curettage Are Major Risk Factors of Local Recurrence in Giant Cell Tumour of Bone.Cancers · 2023Article
- The Role of Denosumab in the Treatment of Primary Tumors of Bone.The Journal of hand surgery · 2023Review
- Review
- Nuclear β-catenin translocation plays a key role in osteoblast differentiation of giant cell tumor of bone.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Bone Turnover Marker (BTM) Changes after Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumors of Bone (GCTB): A Phase II Trial Correlative Study.Cancers · 2022Article
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine: Update on Current Management Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Hypercalcemia following discontinuation of denosumab therapy: A systematic review.Bone reports · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementDenosumab is a RANK ligand inhibitor approved for the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone. While the role of denosumab in the setting of advanced and unresectable disease is well established, its role in surgically resectable disease is currently under discussion. Several prospective and retrospective series on neoadjuvant therapy in potentially resectable tumor with high morbidity surgery reported a relapse rate of 10-20% after resection and 30-40% after curettage. At the same time, less morbid surgery has obvious clinical advantages for the patient, and several studies have shown the efficacy of denosumab in downgrading of the surgical procedure. Currently, the role of neoadjuvant denosumab in operable GCTB is limited to selected cases in which a diffuse reactive bone formation and peripheral ossification can make an easier surgical procedure, for example, in tumors with a large soft tissue component. A planned resection may become less morbid when preoperative denosumab is administered. Whenever a segmental resection is thought to be indicated at diagnosis, denosumab may be considered in the neoadjuvant setting. A preoperative course of 6 months is considered safe and effective. Two case scenarios are presented and critically discussed. Because of the high recurrence rates after denosumab treatment followed by curettage, we discourage the use of denosumab when curettage is considered feasible. In this setting, a short course of preoperative denosumab (2-6 months) may be considered for highly selected cases, for example in pathological fractures. The role of adjuvant denosumab needs further investigation. Long-term disease control has been reported in case of non-surgical lesions, even after treatment interruption, but there is no consensus on ideal treatment duration and dosage for these scenarios. In all cases, multidisciplinary discussion with oncology, pathologist, radiologist, and surgeons is mandatory. Patient's comorbidities, dental conditions, and preferences, including family planning, should always be taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.