Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32623530›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2020

Role of (Neo)adjuvant Denosumab for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone.

Emanuela Palmerini, Eric Lodewijk Staals, Louis Baxter Jones, Davide Maria Donati, Alessandra Longhi, R Lor Randall

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emanuela PalmeriniChemotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. emanuela.palmerini3@unibo.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3406-6705
Eric Lodewijk StaalsOrthopedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Louis Baxter JonesDallas Sarcoma Associates, Medical City Dallas, Dallas, USA.
Davide Maria DonatiOrthopedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandra LonghiChemotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
R Lor RandallOrthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementDenosumab is a RANK ligand inhibitor approved for the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone. While the role of denosumab in the setting of advanced and unresectable disease is well established, its role in surgically resectable disease is currently under discussion. Several prospective and retrospective series on neoadjuvant therapy in potentially resectable tumor with high morbidity surgery reported a relapse rate of 10-20% after resection and 30-40% after curettage. At the same time, less morbid surgery has obvious clinical advantages for the patient, and several studies have shown the efficacy of denosumab in downgrading of the surgical procedure. Currently, the role of neoadjuvant denosumab in operable GCTB is limited to selected cases in which a diffuse reactive bone formation and peripheral ossification can make an easier surgical procedure, for example, in tumors with a large soft tissue component. A planned resection may become less morbid when preoperative denosumab is administered. Whenever a segmental resection is thought to be indicated at diagnosis, denosumab may be considered in the neoadjuvant setting. A preoperative course of 6 months is considered safe and effective. Two case scenarios are presented and critically discussed. Because of the high recurrence rates after denosumab treatment followed by curettage, we discourage the use of denosumab when curettage is considered feasible. In this setting, a short course of preoperative denosumab (2-6 months) may be considered for highly selected cases, for example in pathological fractures. The role of adjuvant denosumab needs further investigation. Long-term disease control has been reported in case of non-surgical lesions, even after treatment interruption, but there is no consensus on ideal treatment duration and dosage for these scenarios. In all cases, multidisciplinary discussion with oncology, pathologist, radiologist, and surgeons is mandatory. Patient's comorbidities, dental conditions, and preferences, including family planning, should always be taken into account.

Indexed as

BiopsyBone and BonesBone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsDenosumabFemaleGiant Cell Tumor of BoneHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyOsteolysisRadiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDenosumabGCTBGiant cell tumor of boneNeoadjuvantPreoperativeSurgery

Identifiers

PMID32623530
OpenAlexW3039236091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.