Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32623493›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2020

Cooperative foraging during larval stage affects fitness in Drosophila.

Mark Dombrovski, Rives Kuhar, Alexandra Mitchell, Hunter Shelton, Barry Condron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Does fly larval cooperative behavior protect against parasitic wasps?Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Do wild-caught fly larvae cooperatively forage?Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Population parameters of Drosophila larval cooperative foraging.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Birth temperature followed by a visual critical period determines cooperative group membership.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark DombrovskiDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22901, USA.
Rives KuharDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22901, USA.
Alexandra MitchellDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22901, USA.
Hunter SheltonDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22901, USA.
Barry CondronDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22901, USA. bc4f@virginia.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2610-5065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperative behavior can confer advantages to animals. This is especially true for cooperative foraging which provides fitness benefits through more efficient acquisition and consumption of food. While examples of group foraging have been widely described, the principles governing formation of such aggregations and rules that determine group membership remain poorly understood. Here, we take advantage of an experimental model system featuring cooperative foraging behavior in Drosophila. Under crowded conditions, fly larvae form coordinated digging groups (clusters), where individuals are linked together by sensory cues and group membership requires prior experience. However, fitness benefits of Drosophila larval clustering remain unknown. We demonstrate that animals raised in crowded conditions on food partially processed by other larvae experience a developmental delay presumably due to the decreased nutritional value of the substrate. Intriguingly, same conditions promote the formation of cooperative foraging clusters which further extends larval stage compared to non-clustering animals. Remarkably, this developmental retardation also results in a relative increase in wing size, serving an indicator of adult fitness. Thus, we find that the clustering-induced developmental delay is accompanied by fitness benefits. Therefore, cooperative foraging, while delaying development, may have evolved to give Drosophila larvae benefits when presented with competition for limited food resources.

Indexed as

AnimalsCooperative BehaviorCuesDrosophila melanogasterFeeding BehaviorFemaleLarvaWings, AnimalCooperationDrosophilaFitnessForagingSocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID32623493
PMCPMC7392940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.