Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32623491›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2020

Off-the-shelf barrier for emergency intubation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Bruno Scheller, Davor Vukadinovic, Sebastian Ewen, Felix Mahfoud

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bruno SchellerInternal Medicine III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany. bruno.scheller@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7139-5298
Davor VukadinovicInternal Medicine III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Sebastian EwenInternal Medicine III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Felix MahfoudInternal Medicine III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Saarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the spread of SARS-CoV-2, it is expected that cases of acute coronary syndrome in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) develop. As expensive and sophisticated protection devices are not widely available, we have been working on a simple, off-the-shelf protection device for endotracheal intubation of potentially infected patients. For this purpose, we used a large transparent plastic bag (such as the sterile protective cover of the lead glass shield) for protection from airborne infections. The cover is moved over the patient's head from cranial to caudal, covering the catheter table including the torso with no need for patient mobilization. The intubation is done conventionally under direct visual control.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationIntubation, IntratrachealOccupational HealthAerosolsCOVID-19EmergenciesEquipment DesignHumansInfection ControlInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalOccupational ExposureAerosolsCatheterization laboratoryCOVID-19Endotracheal intubation

Identifiers

PMID32623491
PMCPMC7335230
OpenAlexW3039261172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.