Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32623425›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2020

Work-focused therapy for common mental disorders: A naturalistic study comparing an intervention group with a waitlist control group.

Ragne G H Gjengedal, Silje E Reme, Kåre Osnes, Suzanne E Lagerfeld, Roland W B Blonk, Kenneth Sandin, Torkil Berge, Odin Hjemdal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ragne G H GjengedalDiakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Silje E RemeUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kåre OsnesDiakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Suzanne E LagerfeldInstituut Gak, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Roland W B BlonkTilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Kenneth SandinDiakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Torkil BergeDiakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Odin HjemdalDiakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NODiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOInstituut Gak · NLNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommon mental disorders (CMD) are leading causes of sickness absence. Treatments for CMD that both reduce symptoms and support work participation urgently need to be developed.

objectiveDetermine the potential effects of work-focused therapy combining work interventions with either meta cognitive therapy or cognitive behavioural therapy (W-MCT/CBT) for patients with CMD on sick leave.

methodsNaturalistic study with a quasi-experimental approach. Pre- and post-scores (return to work, symptoms, return-to-work self-efficacy, clinical recovery from depression and anxiety) were compared between the intervention group (n = 87) who received immediate treatment over an average of 10.40 sessions (SD = 3.09) and the non-randomized waitlist control group (n = 95) that had waited an average of 11.18 weeks (SD = 2.29).

resultsSignificantly more patients returned fully to work in the intervention group (41.4%) than the control group (26.3%). Effect sizes for self-efficacy scores, depression and anxiety were large in the intervention group (d = 1.28, 1.01, 1.58), and significantly lower in the control group (d = 0.60, 0.14, 0.45). Significantly more patients in the treatment group than control group recovered from depression (54.1% vs. 12.8%) and anxiety (50.0% vs.10.6%).

conclusionsW-MCT/CBT may be an effective intervention for patients on sick leave due to CMD.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapySick LeaveAnxietyControl GroupsHumansReturn to Workmental healthReturn to workself-efficacysick leavework-focused metacognitive and cognitive therapy

Identifiers

PMID32623425
PMCPMC7504991
OpenAlexW3040035305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.