ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020
The gluteus maximus V-Y advancement flap for reconstruction of extensive soft tissue loss following an advanced sacral pressure ulcer. A case report and mini review.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of novel strategies in chronic wound management with focusing on pressure ulcers: new perspective.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Review
- Combined application of gluteus maximus muscle flaps and random pattern skin flaps in repairing sacrococcygeal sinus tracts: a prospective study and technical note.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- [Plastic and reconstruction surgery for non-healing wound after posterior spinal surgery].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023Article
- Panniculectomy as a surgical option for the management of a deep surgical site infection after C-section in a morbidly obese woman: a case report.Patient safety in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe occurrence of pressure injuries (PIs) in an inpatient is a serious medical condition that requires a rigorous clinical evaluation. Management of these lesions should be comprehensive, including general measures and local care. Wound care occupies a large part of the treatment. For large skin loss, the treatment requires plastic surgery techniques for reconstruction. Myocutaneous advancement flaps are a good therapeutic option due to the provision of vascularized tissue within the skin defect. To ensure the success of the surgery, a good surgical technique preceeded by careful preparation of the patient in conjunction with the anesthesia team is imperative. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 60-year-old bed ridden man for more than two months following an ischemic stroke with left spastic hemiplegia and loss of sensitivity. He was transferred to our surgical unit for the management of a chronic stage 4 PIs in the sacral area complicated with cellulitis, subcutaneous abscess and severe sepsis. Initial management consisted of resuscitation measures combining fluid therapy, antibiotic therapy, analgesics, blood transfusion, nutritional support, physioteherapy, wound care as well as preventive measures and psychological support. Once the granulation tissues were fully developed, the patient underwent reconstruction surgery with a V-Y myocutaneous advancement flap. The graft was successful with complete wound healing thereafter.
conclusionPIs are a multifactorial, complex and disabling pathology that requires multidisciplinary care. Surgeons, anesthetists, nutritionists, physiotherapists, nurses must act in agreement in order to provide optimal treatment. Prevention is the rule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.