Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32623052›Full record

Observational studyArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2020

Analysis of the Microbiota of the Physiotherapist's Environment.

Tomás Pérez-Fernández, Francisco Llinares-Pinel, Mayte Troya-Franco, Luis Fernández-Rosa

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomás Pérez-FernándezPhysical Therapy Department, CEU San Pablo University, CEU Universities, Madrid. Electronic address: tpfernan@ceu.es.
Francisco Llinares-PinelMicrobiology Department, CEU San Pablo University, CEU Universities, Madrid, Spain.
Mayte Troya-FrancoMicrobiology Department, CEU San Pablo University, CEU Universities, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Fernández-RosaPhysical Therapy Department, CEU San Pablo University, CEU Universities, Madrid.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze the microbiota of the physiotherapist's work environment to understand the existing potential risks and to adopt appropriate preventive measures.

designCross-sectional descriptive observational study.

settingPhysiotherapist's working environment.

participantsPhysiotherapy and rehabilitation centers (N=19).

interventionsA microbiological sampling was carried out in the physiotherapy centers. The samples were studied using the usual culture and analysis methodology for characterization and isolation of a range of bacteria.

main outcome measuresAbsolute and relative frequency of microorganism isolation.

resultsIn the analysis, pathogens normally responsible for nosocomial infections were detected, especially on instruments and equipment used by the physiotherapist such as sponge electrodes, and were significantly more contaminated than the rest of the places studied (P<.01).

conclusionThis situation confirms the absence of measures and protocols for the prevention and control of such infections in the physiotherapist's environment, which is why they must be considered to protect both physiotherapy professionals and patients.

Indexed as

Physical TherapistsBacteriaCross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRehabilitation CentersWorkplaceCross infectionInfection controlRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32623052
PMCPMC7331516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.