Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32622685›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2020

Image Processing Pipeline for Liver Fibrosis Classification Using Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography.

Laura J Brattain, Arinc Ozturk, Brian A Telfer, Manish Dhyani, Joseph R Grajo, Anthony E Samir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Liver fibrosis assessment: MR and US elastography.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
  6. An Automated Region-Selection Method for Adaptive ALARA Ultrasound Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura J BrattainMIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: brattainl@ll.mit.edu.
Arinc OzturkCenter for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian A TelferMIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Manish DhyaniDepartment of Radiology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
Joseph R GrajoAbdominal Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Anthony E SamirCenter for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Development of a Machine Learning Model to Integrate Clinical, Laboratory, Sonographic, and Elastographic Data for Noninvasive Liver Tissue Characterization in NAFLDR01DK119860 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SAMIR, ANTHONY EDWARD · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Reducing Variability in Hepatic Shear Wave ElastographyK23EB020710 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SAMIR, ANTHONY EDWARD · 2016 to 2019
$781k
NIBIB NIH HHS K23 EB020710NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK119860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an automated method for classifying liver fibrosis stage ≥F2 based on ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) and to assess the system's performance in comparison with a reference manual approach. The reference approach consists of manually selecting a region of interest from each of eight or more SWE images, computing the mean tissue stiffness within each of the regions of interest and computing a resulting stiffness value as the median of the means. The 527-subject database consisted of 5526 SWE images and pathologist-scored biopsies, with data collected from a single system at a single site. The automated method integrates three modules that assess SWE image quality, select a region of interest from each SWE measurement and perform machine learning-based, multi-image SWE classification for fibrosis stage ≥F2. Several classification methods were developed and tested using fivefold cross-validation with training, validation and test sets partitioned by subject. Performance metrics were area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), specificity at 95% sensitivity and number of SWE images required. The final automated method yielded an AUROC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.90-0.94) versus 0.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.72) for the reference method, 71% specificity with 95% sensitivity versus 5% and four images per decision versus eight or more. In conclusion, the automated method reported in this study significantly improved the accuracy for ≥F2 classification of SWE measurements as well as reduced the number of measurements needed, which has the potential to reduce clinical workflow.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultLiver fibrosisMachine learningMulti-image classificationShear wave elastographySingle-image classification

Identifiers

PMID32622685
PMCPMC7483774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.