Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32622394›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2020

Ambulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Rob J Hallifax, Edward McKeown, Parthipan Sivakumar, Ian Fairbairn, Christy Peter, Andrew Leitch, Matthew Knight, Andrew Stanton, Asim Ijaz, Stefan Marciniak and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. New strategies in the management of pneumothorax.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Rob J HallifaxOxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: robert.hallifax@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Edward McKeownRoyal Berkshire National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Reading, UK.
Parthipan SivakumarGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ian FairbairnQueen Margaret Hospital, NHS Fife, Dunfermline, UK.
Christy PeterRoyal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Andrew LeitchWestern General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Matthew KnightWest Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK.
Andrew StantonGreat Western Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, UK.
Asim IjazUniversity Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Lancaster, UK.
Stefan MarciniakDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
James CameronNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Amrithraj BhattaBlackpool Fylde and Wyre Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK.
Kevin G BlythQueen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Raja ReddyKettering General Hospital, Kettering, UK.
Marie-Clare HarrisRoyal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Nadeem MaddekarUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Steven WalkerAcademic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Alex WestGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Magda Laskawiec-SzkonterOxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
John P CorcoranUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Stephen GerryCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Corran RobertsCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
John E HarveyNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Nick MaskellAcademic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Robert F MillerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Najib M RahmanOxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBNHS Lothian · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBBlackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBGreat Western Hospital · GBKettering General Hospital · GBQueen Margaret Hospital · GBRoyal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBWest Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0213-30098Medical Research Council G1002610Medical Research Council MR/L017091/1Medical Research Council MR/R009120/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary spontaneous pneumothorax occurs in otherwise healthy young patients. Optimal management is not defined and often results in prolonged hospitalisation. Data on efficacy of ambulatory options are poor. We aimed to describe the duration of hospitalisation and safety of ambulatory management compared with standard care.

methodsIn this open-label, randomised controlled trial, adults (aged 16-55 years) with symptomatic primary spontaneous pneumothorax were recruited from 24 UK hospitals during a period of 3 years. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with either an ambulatory device or standard guideline-based management (aspiration, standard chest tube insertion, or both). The primary outcome was total length of hospital stay including re-admission up to 30 days after randomisation. Patients with available data were included in the primary analysis and all assigned patients were included in the safety analysis. The trial was prospectively registered with the International Standard Randomised Clinical Trials Number, ISRCTN79151659.

findingsOf 776 patients screened between July, 2015, and March, 2019, 236 (30%) were randomly assigned to ambulatory care (n=117) and standard care (n=119). At day 30, the median hospitalisation was significantly shorter in the 114 patients with available data who received ambulatory treatment (0 days [IQR 0-3]) than in the 113 with available data who received standard care (4 days [IQR 0-8]; p<0·0001; median difference 2 days [95% CI 1-3]). 110 (47%) of 236 patients had adverse events, including 64 (55%) of 117 patients in the ambulatory care arm and 46 (39%) of 119 in the standard care arm. All 14 serious adverse events occurred in patients who received ambulatory care, eight (57%) of which were related to the intervention, including an enlarging pneumothorax, asymptomatic pulmonary oedema, and the device malfunctioning, leaking, or dislodging.

interpretationAmbulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax significantly reduced the duration of hospitalisation including re-admissions in the first 30 days, but at the expense of increased adverse events. This data suggests that primary spontaneous pneumothorax can be managed for outpatients, using ambulatory devices in those who require intervention.

fundingUK National Institute for Health Research.

Indexed as

Standard of CareAdultAmbulatory CareFemaleHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMalePatient ReadmissionPneumothoraxUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID32622394
PMCPMC7607300
OpenAlexW3039603979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.