ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2020
Filtered correlation and allowed frequency spectra in dynamic functional connectivity.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDynamic functional connectivity enables us to study brain connectivity occurring at different frequencies. Techniques like sliding window correlation allow for the estimation of time varying connectivity and its frequency spectrum content. Since correlation is equal to the cosine of the phase (cos θ) between activation amplitudes of two brain regions, we assume that phase is the relevant functional connectivity feature and leave out any contamination from activation amplitudes. NEW
methodFirst, this work studies the conditions by which time varying correlation can be separated from nuisance activation amplitudes that are not phase related. Second, we propose the filtered sliding window correlation to perform time varying estimation of cosine-phase (cos θ (t)) and nuisance filtering in one single step.
resultsMathematical models predict the correlation frequencies that should be filtered out to avoid overlap with the activation amplitude spectra. Filtered sliding window correlation excluded nuisance frequencies with an accurate estimation of time varying correlation. Real data outcomes empirically suggest that fMRI frequencies of interest extend up to 0.05 Hz. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsCompared with sliding window methods, the filtered sliding window correlation achieves better estimation for frequencies of interest.
conclusionsThe filtered sliding window correlation approach allows controlling for nuisance frequencies unrelated to time varying phase estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.