Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32621578›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2020

Tridimensional upper airway assessment in male patients with OSA using oral advancement devices modifying their vertical dimension.

Maite Barbero, Carlos Flores-Mir, Juan Calvo Blanco, Valentin Cabriada Nuño, Joan Brunso Casellas, Jose Luis Calvo Girado, Julio Alvarez Amezaga, Felix De Carlos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A consideration of factors affecting palliative oral appliance effectiveness for obstructive sleep apnea: a scoping review.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maite BarberoSurgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Carlos Flores-MirSchool of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Juan Calvo BlancoUnit of Radiology, University Hospital Central of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Valentin Cabriada NuñoSleep and Ventilation Unit, Respiratory Division, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Joan Brunso CasellasOral and Maxillofacial Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Jose Luis Calvo GiradoSurgery and Implantology Department, San Antonio Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Julio Alvarez AmezagaOral and Maxillofacial Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Felix De CarlosSurgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Area of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesMandibular advancement devices (MADs) constitute an alternative treatment in selected patients with OSA. A mandibular advanced position has been suggested to be beneficial, whereas its combination with an increased bite-raise may increase its adverse effects. The objective of this study was to assess upper airway (UA) volume and inspiratory pressure gradient variations in a group of 17 patients with OSA. The study was performed under 3 mandibular positions: intercuspal position (P1), MAD position in closed mouth (P2), and MAD position with an increased bite-raise (P3).

methodsWe conducted a 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pharynx using the finite element method via a computed tomography scan and the subsequent calculation using fluid-dynamic analysis.

resultsOne hundred percent of the patients showed an increase in UA volume in both P2 and the MAD position with an increased bite-raise, P2 being the position where 76.47% of the patients showed the largest UA volume. P2/velopharynx was the position/region where the largest UA volume increase was achieved (4.73 mm³). A better gradient in P2 (mean = 0.62) in 58.82% of the patients and a better gradient in P3 (mean = 0.74) in 41.18% of patients respect P1 was observed. In 82.35% of patients, a better volume-pressure gradient match was also found.

conclusionsThe best efficiency scores for both volume increase and better inspiratory pressure gradient were obtained in P2. This study findings suggest that in a MAD, the minimal bite opening position necessary for mandibular protrusion is more effective in increasing airway volume and inspiratory gradient compared to a larger bite-raising (15 mm).

Indexed as

Mandibular AdvancementSleep Apnea, ObstructiveHumansMaleMandiblePharynxVertical Dimensioncomputational fluid dynamicsmandibular advancement devicessleep apneaupper airway

Identifiers

PMID32621578
PMCPMC7954023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.