Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32621534›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of haematology2020

Benefits of risk-adapted and mould-specific antifungal prophylaxis in childhood leukaemia.

Andreas Meryk, Gabriele Kropshofer, Julia Hutter, Josef Fritz, Christina Salvador, Cornelia Lass-Flörl, Roman Crazzolara

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of haematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Liposomal amphotericin B prophylaxis in paediatrics: a systematic review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Primary Mold-Active Antifungal Prophylaxis Decreases the Need for Chest Computed Tomography Scans in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Andreas MerykDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7749-5334
Gabriele KropshoferDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Julia HutterDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Josef FritzDepartment of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christina SalvadorDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Cornelia Lass-FlörlInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Roman CrazzolaraDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4336-6275
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

Kinderkrebshilfe Südtirol-RegenbogenKinderkrebshilfe Tirol und Vorarlberg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluconazole is one of the most commonly used drugs for antifungal prophylaxis in childhood leukaemia. However, its interaction with vincristine may induce neuropathy and the emergence of antifungal drug resistance contributes to substantial mortality caused by invasive fungal infections (IFIs). In a retrospective single-centre study, we compared tolerability and outcome of different antifungal prophylaxis strategies in 198 children with acute leukaemia (median age 5·3 years). Until 2010, antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole was offered to most of the patients and thereafter was replaced by liposomal amphotericin-B (L-AMB) and restricted to high-risk patients only. Vincristine-induced neurotoxicity was significantly reduced under L-AMB, as the percentage of patients with severe constipation decreased (15·4% vs. 3·7%, before vs. after 31 December·2010, P = 0·01) and stool frequency increased by up to 38% in polyene-treated patients (P = 0·005). Before 2011, 10 patients developed confirmed IFIs, most of them were infected with Aspergillus species. After risk adaption in 2011, IFIs were completely prevented (P = 0·007). L-AMB prophylaxis is beneficial in childhood leukaemia patients, as it offers effective antifungal activity with improved tolerability as compared to fluconazole. The potential impact of our risk-adapted antifungal treatment should be included in current prophylaxis guidelines for childhood leukaemia.

Indexed as

AspergillosisAspergillusAmphotericin BChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFluconazoleHumansLeukemiaMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAmphotericin BFluconazoleliposomal amphotericin Bcancerchildhood leukaemiainvasive fungal infectionliposomal amphotericin-Bprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID32621534
PMCPMC7754307
OpenAlexW3038899530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.