Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32621303›Full record

ArticleExperimental dermatology2020

New insights into the mechanisms behind mechanical itch.

Kent Sakai, Tasuku Akiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of brain functional response to mechanical prickling stimuli to the glabrous and hairy skin.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Interleukin-31 and Pruritic Skin.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  10. The CysLTProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Chronic pruritus: a narrative review.Anais brasileiros de dermatologia
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kent SakaiDr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery and Miami Itch Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Tasuku AkiyamaDr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery and Miami Itch Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7155-4228

Funding

The neuronal circuits of affective itchR01AR074062 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI AKIYAMA, TASUKU · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gentle tactile stimuli, such as insects crawling on the skin, can cause itching sensation called mechanical itch. Recent studies have begun to shed light on the neural mechanisms of mechanical itch. Interestingly, the neural pathway for mechanical itch is apparently different from that for chemical itch triggered by the activation of pruriceptors with various mediators. Mechanical itch dysesthesia is frequently seen in patients with chronic itch. Mechanisms of this dysesthesia are plausibly involved in central sensitization. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of mechanical itch under normal and pathological conditions.

Indexed as

Stress, MechanicalAnimalsChronic DiseaseHumansInterneuronsMiceNeural PathwaysNeuronsParesthesiaPruritusSensory Receptor CellsTouchchemical itchdisinhibitionGRPRLTMRsensitization

Identifiers

PMID32621303
PMCPMC7487064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.