Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32621284›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of dermatology2020

Infection risk of dermatologic therapeutics during the COVID-19 pandemic: an evidence-based recalibration.

Feras M Ghazawi, Megan Lim, Jan P Dutz, Mark G Kirchhof

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 and Dermatology in Iran.Clinics in dermatology
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Feras M GhazawiDivision of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5848-128X
Megan LimDivision of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1548-4357
Jan P DutzDepartment of Dermatology and Skin Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3035-0522
Mark G KirchhofDivision of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-8377
University of Ottawa · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recommendations were made recently to limit or stop the use of oral and systemic immunotherapies for skin diseases due to potential risks to the patients during the current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) COVID-19 pandemic. Herein, we attempt to identify potentially safe immunotherapies that may be used in the treatment of cutaneous diseases during the current COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a literature review to approximate the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including available data on the roles of relevant cytokines, cell subsets, and their mediators in eliciting an optimal immune response against respiratory viruses in murine gene deletion models and humans with congenital deficiencies were reviewed for viral infections risk and if possible coronaviruses specifically. Furthermore, reported risk of infections of biologic and non-biologic therapeutics for skin diseases from clinical trials and drug data registries were evaluated. Many of the immunotherapies used in dermatology have data to support their safe use during the COVID-19 pandemic including the biologics that target IgE, IL-4/13, TNF-α, IL-17, IL-12, and IL-23. Furthermore, we provide evidence to show that oral immunosuppressive medications such as methotrexate and cyclosporine do not significantly increase the risk to patients. Most biologic and conventional immunotherapies, based on doses and indications in dermatology, do not appear to increase risk of viral susceptibility and are most likely safe for use during the COVID-19 pandemic. The limitation of this study is availability of data on COVID-19.

Indexed as

AnimalsBetacoronavirusBiological ProductsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cytokine Release SyndromeDermatologic AgentsDermatologyDisease Models, AnimalDisease SusceptibilityEvidence-Based MedicineHumansImmunologic FactorsMicePandemicsPneumonia, ViralBiological ProductsDermatologic AgentsImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32621284
PMCPMC7361427
OpenAlexW3039488511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.