Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32621282›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2020

Challenges of Engineering Biomimetic Dental and Paradental Tissues.

Mohammed E Grawish, Lamyaa M Grawish, Hala M Grawish, Mahmoud M Grawish, Salwa A El-Negoly

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Graphene-Based Materials for Efficient Neurogenesis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed E GrawishDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Elgomhouria St., Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. Grawish2005@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9401-4352
Lamyaa M GrawishFaculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Delta University for Science and Technology, Costal International Road in front of Industrial Area, Mansoura, Gamasa, 11152, Egypt.
Hala M GrawishFaculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Delta University for Science and Technology, Costal International Road in front of Industrial Area, Mansoura, Gamasa, 11152, Egypt.
Mahmoud M GrawishMansoura Manchester Dental Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Elgomhouria St., Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Salwa A El-NegolyDepartment of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Elgomhouria St., Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Mansoura University · EGDelta University for Science and Technology · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoss of the dental and paradental tissues resulting from trauma, caries or from systemic diseases considered as one of the most significant and frequent clinical problem to the healthcare professionals. Great attempts have been implemented to recreate functionally, healthy dental and paradental tissues in order to substitute dead and diseased tissues resulting from secondary trauma of car accidents, congenital malformations of cleft lip and palate or due to acquired diseases such as cancer and periodontal involvements.

methodAn extensive literature search has been done on PubMed database from 2010 to 2019 about the challenges of engineering a biomimetic tooth (BioTooth) regarding basic biology of the tooth and its supporting structures, strategies, and different techniques of obtaining biological substitutes for dental tissue engineering.

resultsIt has been found that great challenges need to be considered before engineering biomimetic individual parts of the tooth such as enamel, dentin-pulp complex and periodontium. In addition, two approaches have been adopted to engineer a BioTooth. The first one was to engineer a BioTooth as an individual unit and the other was to engineer a BioTooth with its supporting structures.

conclusionEngineering of BioTooth with its supporting structures thought to be in the future will replace the traditional and conventional treatment modalities in the field of dentistry. To accomplish this goal, different cell lines and growth factors with a variety of scaffolds at the nano-scale level are now in use. Recent researches in this area of interest are dedicated for this objective, both in vivo and in vitro. Despite progress in this field, there are still many challenges ahead and need to be overcome, many of which related to the basic tooth biology and its supporting structures and some others related to the sophisticated techniques isolating cells, fabricating the needed scaffolds and obtaining the signaling molecules.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateToothBiomimeticsHumansTissue EngineeringDental tissueScaffoldsSignaling moleculesTissue engineeringTooth biology

Identifiers

PMID32621282
PMCPMC7392996
OpenAlexW3038303948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.