ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2020
Novel biomarkers to assess the risk for acute coronary syndrome: beyond troponins.
Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Evaluation of Novel Biomarkers Compared to ESC 0/1 h and 0/3 h Algorithms in Patients with Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Circulating mitochondrial biomarkers in acute coronary syndrome.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The role of acetazolamide in critical care and emergency medicine.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024Article
- Lactic Acidosis Related to Pharmacotherapy and Human Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Gut Microbiota as Early Predictor of Infectious Complications before Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Pilot Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current diagnostic biomarkers for ACS are mainly represented by troponin I and troponin T. Dosing of these two molecules often leads to false positive results, since their plasma levels can increase in several different systemic settings. Therefore, identification of new markers able to detect patients with acute coronary syndromes is an emerging priority. On this view, many studies have been performed on different microRNAs, mitochondrial peptides, inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules with very promising results. Besides their introduction in screening programs, further studies are now needed in the acute setting, beyond or in association with troponin levels. This will help to better discriminate the real occurrence of an ACS in many patients accessing the emergency department for chest pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.