ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021
Esophageal cancer patients of heavier weight have more nutritional risk of inadequate calorie intake immediately after esophagectomy: a retrospective study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPerioperative malnutrition is common in patients undergoing esophagectomy, and nutritional support is critical for postoperative recovery in these patients. But few studies reported which characteristics of these patients were associated with post-esophagectomy inadequate calorie intake. This study aimed to explore which patients were more likely to have inadequate calories immediately after esophagectomy and the impact on clinical outcomes.
methodsFrom January 2018 to June 2019, patients undergoing esophagectomy were retrospectively divided into the "adequate calorie group" and the "inadequate calorie group" according to whether they met daily calorie requirements in a week after esophagectomy. Caloric requirements met rate and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without complications, and with weight > 70 kg or ≤ 70 kg.
resultsPatients in the inadequate calorie group (n = 104) had significantly higher weight (p < 0.001), lean body mass (p = 0.028), and BMI (p = 0.001) than the adequate calorie group (n = 46). Weight loss after esophagectomy was reduced (p = 0.043) in the adequate calorie group. Patients with complications had lower rate of adequate calorie intake (72.8% vs. 63.8%). The caloric requirements met rate in patients with weigh ≤ 70 kg was significantly higher than those weight > 70 kg (80.2% vs. 43.2%, p < 0.001).
conclusionThe weights of patients having inadequate calories in a week after esophagectomy were significantly heavier than those having adequate calories. Heavier patients after esophagectomy should attract more attention to their nutrition support.
trial registrationThis trial was registered ( ChiCTR1900025557 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.