Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32621248›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Improving screening for physical impairments and access to early physiotherapy after neck dissection surgery: a translational controlled trial.

Aoife C McGarvey, Peter G Osmotherly, Gary R Hoffman, Alix Hall

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aoife C McGarveyEmergency Medicine Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Edith St, Waratah, Newcastle, NSW, 2298, Australia. Aoife.McGarvey@calvarymater.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9586-6613
Peter G OsmotherlySchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Gary R HoffmanSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Alix HallSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUCalvary Hospital · AUJohn Hunter Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLack of routine screening for a range of physical impairments that can result after neck dissection (ND) may hinder physiotherapy referral and treatment. The purpose of this study was to implement an intervention that targeted both physiotherapists and surgeons to increase their post-operative physical screening of ND patients and in turn improve physiotherapy referral rates.

methodsThe authors undertook a translational controlled pilot study, conducted over a 12-month period that utilised three tertiary hospital sites. The target groups were physiotherapists at one intervention site and surgeons at the other intervention site, with the third hospital acting as a control site and receiving usual care. The intervention included a physiotherapy brochure and a clinical pathway for screening, to promote early identification and prompt referral of patients with a physical impairment. The primary outcome variables were screening and referral rates between sites at the study end-point.

resultsLogistic regression analyses were conducted on n = 174 to assess differences in screening and referral rates between sites. Patients at the intervention site that targeted physiotherapists had four times the odds of being screened for shoulder dysfunction compared to the control site (p = 0.0002), and three times the odds of being referred to physiotherapy (0.0039). There were no statistically significant differences in the odds of patients being screened for shoulder dysfunction or referred to physiotherapy at the intervention site that targeted surgeons.

conclusionThe translational intervention undertaken by physiotherapists resulted in significantly greater screening and referral rates of post-operative ND patients for physiotherapy.

Indexed as

Neck DissectionPhysical Therapy ModalitiesHumansPilot ProjectsReferral and ConsultationShoulderEarly rehabilitationNeck dissectionPhysical impairmentPhysiotherapyShoulder dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID32621248
OpenAlexW3038963753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.