ReviewDer Radiologe2020
[Cystic fibrosis and computed tomography of the lungs].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Image quality in ultra-low-dose chest CT versus chest x-rays guiding paediatric cystic fibrosis care.European radiology · 2026Article
- Low-dose high-resolution chest CT in adults with cystic fibrosis: intraindividual comparison between photon-counting and energy-integrating detector CT.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With its high detail of morphological changes in lung parenchyma and airways as well as the possibilities for three-dimensional reconstruction, computed tomography (CT) represents a solid tool for the diagnosis and follow-up in patients suffering from cystic fibrosis (CF). Guidelines for standardized CT image acquisition in CF patients are still missing. In the mostly younger CF patients, an important issue is the well-considered use of radiation in CT imaging. The use of intravenous contrast agent is mainly restricted to acute emergency diagnostics. Typical morphological findings in CF lung disease are bronchiectasis, mucus plugging, or signs of decreased ventilation (air trapping) which can be detected with CT even in early stages. Various scoring systems that have become established over time are used to grade disease severity and for structured follow-up, e.g., in clinical research studies. With the technical development of CT, a number of postprocessing software tools were developed to help clinical reporting and overcome interreader differences for a standardized quantification. As an imaging modality free of ionizing radiation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming increasingly important in the diagnosis and follow-up of CF patients and is already frequently a substitute for CT for long-term follow-up at numerous specialized centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.